Check a mark
A Borehole code resolves to the analysis we actually ran. Type the code printed on a report and this page re-renders the authoritative version — not a claim about it.
Twelve characters. Case and dashes do not matter.
Verified
This code matches a Borehole analysis of hashicorp/terraform, and the record is unchanged since the mark was issued.
- Repository
- hashicorp/terraform
- Commit
- 7dd5b3394b4487afc235b86a1a588e5c8fef8e7e
- Surveyed
- 2026-09-23
- Mark issued
- 2026-09-24
- Assessor
- borehole 0.1.0.dev0
- Checks run
- 36
Its report page publishes this analysis under today's rules. The mark above still attests to the record as issued. The page differs from it as follows, and its headline band reads adequate.
- Words about people are today's: bands rather than exact shares, dates or day counts, and what the history measured rather than why.
- 2 findings rated significant by a check that has not yet held up in Borehole's calibration are now worth checking first.
- 4 findings from checks Borehole's calibration found wrong more often than right are no longer published.
- The file and line of 5 credential-shaped matches are withheld. File and line are shown to whoever GitHub says controls this repository, signed in, and to a buyer of this report.
This mark covers 36 checks. Borehole now runs 106. A mark attests to the survey that was run, not to the checks written since it was issued. If the newer checks matter to you, ask for a fresh repo survey at this commit.
What the analysis recorded
| Dimension | Band | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance | significant findings | 2 |
| Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity | strong | 0 |
| Organization & Key-Person Risk | strong | 0 |
| Product & Engineering Maturity | significant findings | 2 |
| Security & Reliability Posture | significant findings | 5 |
| Observability & Operations | adequate | 1 |
| Fit with the Acquirer | not assessable | 0 |