{"band":"strong","note":"Deterministic layer only. No model calls were made and no source content left this machine.","layer":"deterministic","coverage":{"statement":"A repository answers roughly three and a half of seven dimensions. The rest are reported as not assessable, with the questions a human would ask instead.","languages_read":["1C Enterprise","4D","ABAP","ABAP CDS","AGS Script","AIDL","AL","ALGOL","AMPL","ANTLR","APL","ASL","ASP.NET","ATS","ActionScript","Ada","Agda","Aiken","Aleo","Alloy","AngelScript","Answer Set Programming","Apex","Apollo Guidance Computer","AppleScript","Arc","ArkTS","AspectJ","Assembly","Augeas","AutoHotkey","AutoIt","Awk","B (Formal Method)","B4X","BAML","BQN","Ballerina","Batchfile","Beef","Befunge","Bend","Berry","Bicep","Bison","BitBake","BlitzBasic","BlitzMax","Bluespec","Boo","Boogie","Brightscript","C","C#","C++","C2hs Haskell","C3","CAP CDS","CLIPS","CMake","COBOL","CQL","CWeb","Cadence","Cairo","CameLIGO","Cangjie","Cap'n Proto","Carbon","CartoCSS","Ceylon","Chapel","Charity","ChucK","Circom","Cirru","Clarion","Clarity","Classic ASP","Clean","Click","Clojure","Clue","CodeQL","CoffeeScript","ColdFusion","ColdFusion CFC","Common Lisp","Common Workflow Language","Component Pascal","Crystal","Csound","Csound Document","Csound Score","Cuda","Curry","Cycript","Cypher","Cython","D","DIGITAL Command Language","DM","Dafny","Dart","Daslang","DataWeave","Dhall","Dockerfile","Dogescript","Dylan","E","ECL","EQ","EdgeQL","Elixir","Elm","Elvish","Emacs Lisp","EmberScript","Erlang","F#","F*","FIRRTL","FLUX","FPP","Factor","Fancy","Fantom","Fennel","Filebench WML","Flix","Fluent","Forth","Fortran","Fortran Free Form","FreeBASIC","FreeMarker","Futhark","G-code","GAML","GAMS","GAP","GDB","GDScript","GDShader","GLSL","GSC","Genero 4gl","Genshi","Gentoo Ebuild","Gentoo Eclass","Gherkin","Gleam","Glimmer JS","Glimmer TS","Glyph","Gno","Gnuplot","Go","Golo","Gosu","Grace","Grammatical Framework","Groovy","Groovy Server Pages","HCL","HIP","HLSL","Hack","Harbour","Hare","Haskell","Haxe","HiveQL","HolyC","Hurl","Hy","IDL","IGOR Pro","IL Assembly","ISPC","Idris","ImHex Pattern Language","ImageJ Macro","Imba","Inform 7","Ink","Inno Setup","Io","Ioke","Isabelle","J","JASS","JCL","JFlex","JSONiq","Jac","Jai","Janet","Java","Java Server Pages","Java Template Engine","JavaScript","JavaScript+ERB","JetBrains MPS","Jison","Jison Lex","Jolie","Jsonnet","Julia","Just","KCL","KRL","Kaitai Struct","KakouneScript","Koka","Kotlin","LFE","LLVM","LLVM TableGen","LOLCODE","LSL","LabVIEW","Langium","Lasso","Lean","Leo","Lex","LigoLANG","LilyPond","Linker Script","Liquidsoap","Literate Agda","Literate CoffeeScript","Literate Haskell","LiveCode Script","LiveScript","Lobster","Logos","Logtalk","LookML","Lua","Luau","M","M4","MATLAB","MAXScript","MLIR","MQL4","MQL5","MUF","Macaulay2","Makefile","Mako","Max","MeTTa","Mercury","Metal","MiniD","MiniZinc","Mint","Mirah","Modelica","Modula-3","Module Management System","Mojo","Monkey","MoonBit","MoonScript","Motorola 68K Assembly","Move","Myghty","NASL","NSIS","NWScript","Nearley","NetLinx","NetLinx+ERB","NetLogo","Nextflow","Nim","Nit","Nix","Nu","NumPy","OCaml","OMNeT++ NED","Oberon","Objective-C","Objective-C++","Objective-J","Odin","Omgrofl","Opa","Opal","Open Policy Agent","OpenCL","OpenQASM","OpenSCAD","OverPy","OverpassQL","Ox","Oxygene","Oz","P4","PDDL","PEG.js","PHP","PLSQL","PLpgSQL","POV-Ray SDL","Pact","Pan","Papyrus","Parrot","Parrot Assembly","Parrot Internal Representation","Pascal","Pawn","Pep8","Perl","PigLatin","Pike","PogoScript","Polar","Pony","Portugol","Power Query","PowerBuilder","PowerShell","Praat","Processing","Prolog","Promela","Propeller Spin","Puppet","PureBasic","PureScript","Pyret","Python","Q#","QML","QMake","QuakeC","Quint","R","RAScript","REALbasic","REXX","RPGLE","Racket","Ragel","Raku","Rascal","ReScript","Reason","ReasonLIGO","Rebol","Red","Redcode","RenderScript","Rhai","Ring","RobotFramework","Roc","Rocq Prover","Rouge","Ruby","Rust","SAS","SMT","SQF","SQL","SQLPL","SWIG","Sage","Sail","Salt","Scala","Scenic","Scheme","Scilab","Self","Shell","ShellSession","Shen","Sieve","Slang","Slash","SmPL","Smali","Smithy","Snakemake","Solidity","SourcePawn","Squirrel","Stan","Standard ML","Starlark","Stata","SurrealQL","Swift","SystemVerilog","TI Program","TL-Verilog","TLA","TSX","TXL","Tact","Talon","Tape","Tcl","Tcsh","Thrift","Toit","Tolk","Turing","TypeScript","Unified Parallel C","Uno","UnrealScript","Untyped Plutus Core","UrWeb","VBA","VBScript","VCL","VHDL","Vala","Verilog","Verse","Vim script","Visual Basic .NET","Visual Basic 6.0","Volt","Vyper","WDL","WGSL","WebAssembly","WebIDL","Whiley","Witcher Script","Wolfram Language","Wollok","Wren","X10","XC","XProc","XQuery","XS","XSLT","Xojo","Xonsh","Xtend","YARA","Yacc","Yul","ZAP","ZIL","Zeek","ZenScript","Zephir","Zig","Zimpl","eC","fish","hoon","mIRC Script","mcfunction","mupad","nesC","ooc","sed","wisp","xBase"],"total_dimensions":7,"assessable_dimensions":6},"degraded":"History truncated at 50,000 commits, the most a hosted survey reads. Signals needing the full history are reported as inconclusive rather than clean.","dimensions":[{"id":"01","band":"strong","name":"Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance","coverage":"full","findings":[{"id":"01.3","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"Commit messages are templated rather than written","signal":"message_uniformity","weight":"corroborating","context":true,"evidence":[{"ref":"commit-subjects","kind":"metric","detail":"3989× 'Update rabbitmq-components.mk'"},{"ref":"commit-subjects","kind":"metric","detail":"836× 'Update erlang.mk'"},{"ref":"commit-subjects","kind":"metric","detail":"256× 'Travis CI: Update config from rabbitmq-common'"}],"observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"01","rationale":"35% of commit subjects are exact repeats of another subject, and subject length varies by only 32.2 characters. A log written by someone explaining their reasoning to a future reader does not look like this. The log is therefore weak evidence of intent, whatever the code is like. This was read from the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) only; older history was not read.","context_why":"A note that does not affect this rating: in Borehole's calibration, this check's notes were usually true but overstated."},{"id":"01.6","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"erlang.mk is 4,972 lines, 54× this codebase's median file","signal":"oversized_modules","weight":"corroborating","context":true,"evidence":[{"ref":"line-count","kind":"path","path":"erlang.mk","detail":"4,972 lines (54× median)","line_end":4972,"line_start":1},{"ref":"line-count","kind":"path","path":"deps/rabbit/src/rabbit_fifo.erl","detail":"4,834 lines (52× median)","line_end":4834,"line_start":1},{"ref":"line-count","kind":"path","path":"deps/rabbitmq_stream/src/rabbit_stream_reader.erl","detail":"4,553 lines (49× median)","line_end":4553,"line_start":1},{"ref":"line-count","kind":"path","path":"deps/rabbit/src/rabbit_fifo_v8.erl","detail":"4,332 lines (47× median)","line_end":4332,"line_start":1},{"ref":"line-count","kind":"path","path":"deps/rabbit/src/rabbit_amqp_session.erl","detail":"4,313 lines (46× median)","line_end":4313,"line_start":1}],"observed":{"largest":4972,"library":{"n":382,"share":57,"value":54.0,"cutoff":138.63,"material":false,"percentile":85},"threshold":1000,"files_over":56,"median_lines":92},"dimension":"01","rationale":"The median source file here is 92 lines. 56 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 4,972. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.","context_why":"A note that does not affect this rating: measured against its own codebase's median, it is below the 85th percentile of 382 surveyed projects' largest files, where this check begins to count."}],"signals_run":11,"conclusive_signals":7,"what_a_person_adds":[{"id":"01.38","kind":"H+","where":"The team","measured":"The tree carries design documentation (deps/rabbitmq_cli/DESIGN.md).","question":"Does it match what the team believes today? Ask them to walk through it against the code."},{"id":"01.39","kind":"H","where":"Your architects, with the product roadmap","question":"Is the architecture right for the next three years of the product?"},{"id":"01.40","kind":"H","where":"The team's reasoning at the time","question":"Were the home-grown components reasonable choices when they were made, and are they now?"}]},{"id":"02","band":"adequate","name":"Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity","coverage":"high","findings":[{"id":"02.29","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"Pinned dependencies have not moved in 54 months","signal":"dependency_update_cadence","weight":"corroborating","evidence":[{"ref":"git log -1 -- deps/rabbitmq_consistent_hash_exchange/examples/ruby/Gemfile.lock","kind":"metric","detail":"deps/rabbitmq_consistent_hash_exchange/examples/ruby/Gemfile.lock last changed 2022-04-20"}],"observed":{"lockfiles":1,"commits_since":9304,"days_since_lockfile_changed":1646},"dimension":"02","rationale":"The lockfile last changed 1646 days before the newest commit, and 9,304 commits have landed since. Every security fix published upstream in that time is absent until someone updates it, and the longer the gap the larger and riskier that update becomes."}],"signals_run":16,"conclusive_signals":12,"what_a_person_adds":[{"id":"02.32","kind":"H","where":"The code host's pull request data","question":"Is review real or a rubber stamp? Comment depth and time to approve need the pull request history."},{"id":"02.38","kind":"H","where":"The issue tracker: backlog, sprint history, estimate accuracy","question":"Is delivery planned and measured, or heroic?"},{"id":"02.37","kind":"H","where":"Tickets, chat and postmortems","question":"How are incidents run, reviewed and learned from?"}]},{"id":"03","band":"strong","name":"Organization & Key-Person Risk","coverage":"partial","findings":[],"signals_run":10,"conclusive_signals":6,"what_a_person_adds":[{"id":"03.29","kind":"H+","where":"The deal terms","measured":"350 people have committed here.","question":"Which of them are you acquiring, and which are you replacing?"},{"id":"03.28","kind":"H","where":"The team; review history only suggests candidates","question":"Who mentors whom, and would that survive a departure?"},{"id":"03.30","kind":"H","where":"Recruiting data and the org chart","question":"Can the team grow, and who stands behind the top three contributors?"},{"id":"03.31","kind":"H","where":"HR data","question":"Is the seniority mix sound, and will pay survive your salary bands?"},{"id":"03.14","kind":"H","where":"Interviews and on-call history","question":"Is the pace sustainable? Commit times cannot say: git keeps no reliable local time."},{"id":"03.32","kind":"H","where":"Interviews","question":"Does the team want to stay after close?"},{"id":"03.33","kind":"H","where":"Time with the team","question":"How are decisions made and disagreements resolved?"}]},{"id":"04","band":"strong","name":"Product & Engineering Maturity","coverage":"minimal","findings":[{"id":"04.5","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"Effort is shifting from building to rewriting","signal":"churn_trend","weight":"corroborating","context":true,"evidence":[{"ref":"deletions-per-insertion","kind":"metric","detail":"first half 0.40, second half 0.75 (split 2019-07-22)"}],"observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"04","rationale":"Deleted lines per line added rose from 0.40 to 0.75 between the first and second halves of this history. Rework is normal and often healthy, but a rising ratio means an increasing share of the team's time is spent replacing code that already exists rather than building what does not. Whether that is deliberate repayment or churn is a question for the team. This was read from the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) only; older history was not read.","context_why":"A note that does not affect this rating: in Borehole's calibration, this check's notes were usually true but overstated."},{"id":"04.62","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed","signal":"release_branch","weight":"corroborating","context":true,"evidence":[{"ref":"24d5157cd","kind":"commit","detail":"tag v4.4.0"}],"observed":{"elsewhere":346,"on_branch":99,"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","tags_in_window":445,"direction_known":true,"later_on_branch":0},"dimension":"04","rationale":"The newest release, v4.4.0, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v3.13.0. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too. This was read from the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) only; older history was not read.","context_why":"A note that does not affect this rating: notes like it are common in well-run projects."}],"signals_run":19,"conclusive_signals":11,"what_a_person_adds":[{"id":"04.11","kind":"H+","where":"The team","measured":"2,178 commits landed in the last year, against 1,531 the year before (+42%).","question":"What drove it: new people, a deadline, or code produced faster than before?"},{"id":"04.32","kind":"H","where":"The data room and the team's record of estimates","question":"Can this team deliver the stated roadmap on the stated timeline?"},{"id":"04.31","kind":"H","where":"Budget and roadmap decisions","question":"Does leadership know about the debt, and is time budgeted to repay it?"},{"id":"04.33","kind":"H","where":"Revenue, customer and churn data","question":"Is the engineering shape consistent with the commercial story?"}]},{"id":"05","band":"adequate","name":"Security & Reliability Posture","coverage":"partial","findings":[{"id":"05.1","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"9 credential-shaped strings in the tree sit in tests, examples, documentation or local development settings","signal":"committed_secrets","weight":"corroborating","evidence":[{"kind":"metric","ref":"AWS access key","detail":"4 cited: AWS access key, where fakes are usual"},{"kind":"metric","ref":"private key block","detail":"private key block, where fakes are usual"}],"observed":{"sample_matches":9,"inert_tokens_set_aside":0},"dimension":"05","rationale":"Strings shaped like credentials appear only where fakes are usual: test fixtures, examples, documentation, placeholders and local stacks. They are almost always fakes. Ask someone to confirm that none of them works anywhere, because a real key in a development file is still a real key.","locations_withheld":5},{"id":"05.6","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"2 Dockerfiles run the application as root","signal":"container_runs_as_root","weight":"corroborating","evidence":[{"ref":"no-USER-instruction","kind":"path","path":".oss-scanner/Dockerfile","detail":"runs as root"},{"ref":"no-USER-instruction","kind":"path","path":"packaging/docker-image/Dockerfile","detail":"runs as root"}],"observed":{"rootful":2,"dockerfiles":2},"dimension":"05","rationale":"No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically."},{"id":"05.27","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"The build runs third-party code it does not pin","signal":"supply_chain_pinning","weight":"corroborating","context":true,"evidence":[{"ref":".github/workflows/test-authnz.yaml","kind":"path","path":".github/workflows/test-authnz.yaml","detail":"action pinned by tag","line_end":48,"line_start":48},{"ref":".github/workflows/test-make-target.yaml","kind":"path","path":".github/workflows/test-make-target.yaml","detail":"action pinned by tag","line_end":65,"line_start":65},{"ref":"deps/rabbitmq_ct_helpers/tools/terraform/direct-vms/templates/setup-erlang.sh","kind":"path","path":"deps/rabbitmq_ct_helpers/tools/terraform/direct-vms/templates/setup-erlang.sh","detail":"download piped into a shell","line_end":190,"line_start":190}],"observed":{"action_refs":69,"pipe_to_shell":1,"unpinned_third_party":4},"dimension":"05","rationale":"4 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day; 1 step pipes a download straight into a shell. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.","context_why":"A note that does not affect this rating: notes like it are common in well-run projects."},{"id":"05.9","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"1 vendored component with no licence","signal":"license_vendored_unlicensed","weight":"corroborating","context":true,"evidence":[{"ref":"deps/trust_store_http","kind":"path","path":"deps/trust_store_http","detail":"10 tracked files, no licence file"}],"observed":{"unlicensed":["deps/trust_store_http"],"total_components":56,"stated_in_headers_or_notices":0},"dimension":"05","rationale":"Third-party code is committed into this repository without any statement of the terms it arrived under. Unknown terms are harder to deal with than inconvenient ones: an awkward licence can be complied with, an absent one cannot. Each of these needs its origin established before the code changes hands.","context_why":"A note that does not affect this rating: in Borehole's calibration, this check's notes were usually true but overstated."},{"id":"05.65","band":"adequate","layer":"deterministic","title":"86 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 22 high or critical","signal":"advisory_record","weight":"corroborating","context":true,"evidence":[{"ref":"GHSA-j6hc-926v-qwq2","kind":"advisory","detail":"2026-09-18: GHSA-j6hc-926v-qwq2 (moderate), fixed in 4.2.11: RabbitMQ STOMP consumers retain OAuth queue access after JWT expiration"},{"ref":"GHSA-6jvc-jx8w-m757","kind":"advisory","detail":"2026-09-18: GHSA-6jvc-jx8w-m757 (low), fixed in 4.2.11: RabbitMQ Stream Publisher Management API Discloses Unauthorized Vhost and Stream Existence"},{"ref":"GHSA-342v-cj47-c9g8","kind":"advisory","detail":"2026-09-18: GHSA-342v-cj47-c9g8 (low), fixed in 4.2.11: Cross-vhost Stream consumer virtual-host existence disclosure"},{"ref":"GHSA-5jgm-jxp7-gwjh","kind":"advisory","detail":"2026-09-18: GHSA-5jgm-jxp7-gwjh (moderate), fixed in 4.3.5: MQTT retained message store has no size or count limit and is never reclaimed"},{"ref":"GHSA-6gmw-wxch-cvvc","kind":"advisory","detail":"2026-08-18: GHSA-6gmw-wxch-cvvc (moderate), fixed in 3.13.19: Shovel URI credentials disclosed to read-only monitoring users via the shovel management HTTP API"}],"observed":{"newest":"2026-09-18","critical":2,"affecting":0,"could_not_tell":83,"fix_unreleased":0,"last_24_months":86,"sources_failed":[],"known_exploited":0,"high_or_critical":22,"affecting_newest_release_only":1},"dimension":"05","rationale":"The newest was published on 2026-09-18. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 83 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 3.13.0. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version. GHSA-27gv-h5q6-cpwg (low) is fixed in the surveyed commit; which release carries it cannot be told from this history, which does not place the release users run. Answer lives in: the version you run.","context_why":"A note that does not affect this rating: it describes the project's advisory record, and no advisory in it is known to affect the surveyed commit."}],"signals_run":34,"conclusive_signals":19,"what_a_person_adds":[{"id":"05.38","kind":"H+","where":"The provider's console and audit log","measured":"05.5 found credential-shaped strings in this repository.","question":"Was each one revoked at the provider? Deleting it from the code revokes nothing; only the provider's audit log shows that it was."},{"id":"05.43","kind":"H+","where":"The security owner","measured":"A threat model is in the tree (.oss-scanner/threat_model.md).","question":"Does it name the assets this code actually handles, and is it current against the deployment?"},{"id":"05.41","kind":"H","where":"Ticketing and chat","question":"What has actually broken, how often, and how badly?"},{"id":"05.42","kind":"H","where":"Reports in the data room","question":"What did external testing find, and was it fixed?"},{"id":"05.44","kind":"H","where":"Audit reports; policy files in the tree are not evidence","question":"What is the SOC 2, ISO 27001 or GDPR status, and where is the evidence?"}]},{"id":"06","band":"not assessable","name":"Observability & Operations","coverage":"partial","findings":[],"signals_run":16,"conclusive_signals":4,"what_a_person_adds":[{"id":"06.29","kind":"H","where":"Pager history and dashboard logs","question":"Are the dashboards opened, the alerts acknowledged and the pages answered?"},{"id":"06.30","kind":"H","where":"Production metrics","question":"Are the service-level objectives actually met?"},{"id":"06.31","kind":"H","where":"Pager exports and interviews","question":"Who carries the pager, and how often does it go off?"},{"id":"06.32","kind":"H","where":"Cloud billing and capacity plans","question":"What does it cost to run, and how much headroom is there?"}],"not_assessable_reason":"only 4 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it"},{"id":"07","band":"not assessable","name":"Fit with the Acquirer","coverage":"none","findings":[],"signals_run":0,"conclusive_signals":0,"what_a_person_adds":[{"id":"07.1","kind":"H+","question":"This is primarily a Erlang codebase, with Elixir alongside (25% of source files). Does your engineering organisation already run Erlang in production, or would this be the first?"},{"id":"07.10","kind":"H+","question":"The bulk of this system sits in deps/, release-notes/, packaging/. Which of your existing systems would each of those have to absorb or replace?"},{"id":"07.2","kind":"H+","question":"The repository carries deployment configuration (.oss-scanner/Dockerfile and 17 more). Does that match your deployment and on-call model, or does it need rehosting first?"},{"id":null,"kind":"H+","question":"What is your tolerance for the findings above remaining unaddressed for the first two quarters after close, given everything else that will compete for this team's time?"},{"id":"07.11","kind":"H","where":"Your architecture","question":"Which of these systems duplicate yours, and which get retired?"},{"id":"07.12","kind":"H","where":"The engagement","question":"What will integration cost, and in what order?"},{"id":"07.13","kind":"H","where":"Your org design","question":"Where does the team land in your organisation, and who reports to whom?"},{"id":"07.14","kind":"H","where":"Deal terms","question":"Are there earn-outs, retention packages or contractor IP to assign?"},{"id":"07.15","kind":"H","where":"Customer contracts","question":"Do customer contracts limit hosting, regions or vendors?"}],"not_assessable_reason":"structurally not assessable from a repository"}],"repository":{"loc":637210,"head":"76723eec3894c670fa2889e7765523294e358007","slug":"rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server","tags":572,"stars":13937,"shallow":false,"span_days":5299.1,"last_commit":"2026-10-22T18:18:30+00:00","surveyed_at":"2026-10-22T21:08:48.650582+00:00","commits_read":50000,"first_commit":null,"truncated_at":50000,"window_start":"2012-04-19T15:16:25+00:00","tracked_files":3715,"history_complete":false},"generated_at":"2026-10-22T21:10:28.964754+00:00","generated_by":"borehole 0.7.15","rejection_log":[{"reason":"change is spread across the codebase rather than pooling in a few files, in the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","signal":"hotspot_concentration","observed":{"files":8225,"top5_share":0.022,"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"debt markers are sparse","signal":"debt_markers","observed":{"markers":303,"per_kloc":0.48,"lines_read":634256},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no dependency manifest of the product's own was found","signal":"dependency_sprawl","observed":{"set_aside":{"selenium/package.json":"not product code (test)","deps/rabbitmq_stomp/test/python_SUITE_data/src/requirements.txt":"not product code (test)","deps/rabbitmq_consistent_hash_exchange/examples/python/requirements.txt":"not product code (example)"},"manifests_checked":["package.json","go.mod","requirements.txt","requirements.in","pyproject.toml"]},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"test effort kept pace with code written, in the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","signal":"test_growth","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","late_test_per_code":0.727,"early_test_per_code":0.176},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no pinned runtime version to check","signal":"eol_runtime","observed":{"pinned":0},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"fixes usually come with a test","signal":"fixes_with_tests","observed":{"fixes":431,"share":0.589,"with_tests":254},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"fixing is not crowding out building","signal":"fix_share_trend","observed":{"fix_share_by_quarter_newest_first":[0.12,0.18,0.13,0.11,0.09,0.1,0.09,0.09]},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no schema migrations to read","signal":"schema_churn","observed":{},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"a library, whose compatibility code is usually deliberate","signal":"compat_layers","observed":{},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no JavaScript manifest to read","signal":"dependency_redundancy","observed":{},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"this repository does not deploy a running service, so instrumentation is not expected of it","signal":"telemetry_presence","observed":{"basis":"nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","files_read":3020},"dimension":"06","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not assessed for Erlang or Elixir, the languages the product is written in: this check's patterns read other languages only","signal":"structured_logging","observed":{"basis":"nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","languages_not_read":["Erlang","Elixir"]},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not a running service, so a health endpoint is not expected","signal":"healthcheck_presence","observed":{"basis":"nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere"},"dimension":"06","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"telemetry_depth","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"print_logging","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"correlation_ids","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"error_reporting","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"the product's code names no reporting host","signal":"usage_reporting_default","observed":{"settings_on":0,"settings_off":0,"reporting_hosts":[]},"dimension":"06","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"alert_rules","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"deployed_image_floats","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no Kubernetes probes","signal":"probes_identical","observed":{},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no Kubernetes deployments","signal":"single_replica","observed":{},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"environment_branching","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not expected of it: nothing in this repository deploys a long-running server; if it runs as one, its deployment lives elsewhere","signal":"release_markers","observed":{"service":false},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"migrations do not run at container start","signal":"migrate_on_start","observed":{},"dimension":"06","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no feature-flag service; flags may live elsewhere","signal":"feature_flags","observed":{"sdk_files":0,"evaluation_sites":0},"dimension":"06","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no single contributor dominates the last 24 months","signal":"contributor_concentration","observed":{"years":null,"window":"last 24 months","authors":350,"top_share":"a quarter or more","bus_factor":3,"years_read":14.5,"authors_in_window":80,"top_share_all_time":"less than a quarter","bus_factor_all_time":3},"dimension":"03","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not assessed: this check needs the whole history, and only the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) were read","signal":"active_contributors","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"03","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed: this check needs the whole history, and only the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) were read","signal":"knowledge_silos","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"03","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed: this check needs the whole history, and only the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) were read","signal":"drive_by_contributors","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"03","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed: this check needs the whole history, and only the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) were read","signal":"contributor_attrition","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"03","conclusive":false},{"reason":"more than one person changes the critical paths","signal":"critical_path_ownership","observed":{"authors":80,"sole_owned_areas":[]},"dimension":"03","conclusive":true},{"reason":"the second and third contributors are still active","signal":"second_contributor_attrition","observed":{"gone":[]},"dimension":"03","conclusive":true},{"reason":"the team has not narrowed to one person","signal":"bus_factor_trend","observed":{"by_year_newest_first":[3,4,4,4]},"dimension":"03","conclusive":true},{"reason":"the team is not shrinking","signal":"joiners_and_leavers","observed":{"left":7,"joined":11,"regular_last_year":28,"regular_prior_year":26},"dimension":"03","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not observable from this history: it mirrors a Mercurial repository, where review happens outside git","signal":"merge_discipline","observed":{"mirror":"Mercurial","commits":50000},"dimension":"02","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not observable from this history: it mirrors a Mercurial repository, whose process runs outside git","signal":"ci_presence","observed":{"mirror":"Mercurial"},"dimension":"02","conclusive":false},{"reason":"tests are present in a normal proportion to source","signal":"test_presence","observed":{"tests":983,"source":2153,"test_ratio":0.457},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not assessed: this check needs the whole history, and only the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) were read","signal":"release_cadence","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"02","conclusive":false},{"reason":"commit subjects generally carry content, in the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","signal":"conventional_commits","observed":{"sampled":36764,"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","low_content_share":0.048},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not observable from this history: it mirrors a Mercurial repository, whose process runs outside git","signal":"branch_protection_hints","observed":{"mirror":"Mercurial"},"dimension":"02","conclusive":false},{"reason":"CI invokes a test runner","signal":"ci_runs_tests","observed":{"sample":[".github/workflows/test-authnz.yaml",".github/workflows/test-make-tests.yaml",".github/workflows/test-management-ui-for-pr.yaml"],"configs":18,"with_tests":4},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"few tests are switched off","signal":"skipped_tests","observed":{"focused":0,"skipped":0,"test_files":1334,"files_with_skips":0},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no test run in CI is written so that it cannot fail","signal":"ci_test_gating","observed":{"configs":18},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"change is rarely undone","signal":"revert_share","observed":{"share":0.008,"reverts":28,"recent_commits":3714},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"tests are not retried until they pass","signal":"flaky_test_markers","observed":{"test_retries":0,"suite_retries":0},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"a linter or formatter runs in the build","signal":"lint_in_build","observed":{"wired":4,"ci_configs":18,"product_files":1177},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"the typical branch reaches the trunk quickly","signal":"long_lived_branches","observed":{"share":0.026,"merges":1551,"long_lived":41,"median_days":0},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"changes arrive in reviewable sizes","signal":"commit_size","observed":{"share":0.01,"commits":3284,"over_2000_lines":33},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"the largest burst was vendored dependencies (95% of it), which explains the rate: translations arrive from a vendor in bulk, dependencies and generated code are committed whole, a merged pull request is dated when it merged, not when it was written, a branch merged by a merge commit was reviewed as one piece, and an export or mirror tool dates history when it replays it, in the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","signal":"burst_import","observed":{"kinds":["vendored dependencies"],"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","largest_commits":"7ca1de5..30e1bf5","bursts_explained":11,"largest_net_added":18606},"dimension":"01","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not assessed: this check needs the whole history, and only the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) were read","signal":"initial_dump","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"01","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed: this check needs the whole history, and only the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) were read","signal":"revision_depth","observed":{"history_read":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)"},"dimension":"01","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed for Erlang or Elixir, the languages the product is written in: this check's patterns read other languages only","signal":"swallowed_errors","observed":{"loc":637210,"files":5,"per_kloc":0.02,"swallowed":11,"languages_not_read":["Erlang","Elixir"]},"dimension":"01","conclusive":false},{"reason":"every base image names a version","signal":"build_reproducibility","observed":{"floating":0,"from_lines":3},"dimension":"01","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no language migration is stalled halfway","signal":"unfinished_migration","observed":{},"dimension":"01","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not a data or machine-learning repository","signal":"notebook_outputs","observed":{},"dimension":"01","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no model weights are committed","signal":"weights_in_git","observed":{"files":0},"dimension":"01","conclusive":true},{"reason":"at least one standard guard rail is configured","signal":"security_guardrails","observed":{"present":[".github/SECURITY.md",".github/dependabot.yaml"]},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"a lockfile is committed, so builds are reproducible","signal":"dependency_pinning","observed":{"lockfile":true},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"a licence file is present","signal":"license_present","observed":{"found":true},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no environment file is committed outside tests and examples","signal":"secrets_management_pattern","observed":{"env_files":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not a running service","signal":"outbound_timeouts","observed":{},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"too few migrations to judge","signal":"migration_reversibility","observed":{"migrations":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not a running service; a library that builds SQL is doing its job","signal":"sql_from_strings","observed":{},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed for Erlang or Elixir, the languages the product is written in: this check's patterns read other languages only","signal":"shell_from_strings","observed":{"sites":0,"languages_not_read":["Erlang","Elixir"]},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed for Erlang or Elixir, the languages the product is written in: this check's patterns read other languages only","signal":"unsafe_deserialization","observed":{"sites":0,"languages_not_read":["Erlang","Elixir"]},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed for Erlang or Elixir, the languages the product is written in: this check's patterns read other languages only","signal":"tls_verification_off","observed":{"files":0,"sites":0,"pinned_instead":0,"behind_an_opt_in":0,"languages_not_read":["Erlang","Elixir"]},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no Kubernetes workload manifests","signal":"resource_limits","observed":{"workloads":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not assessed for Mix: this survey does not read their dependency files","signal":"known_vulnerabilities","observed":{"dependencies":0,"ecosystems_not_read":["Mix"]},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no workload runs privileged or in the host's namespaces","signal":"privileged_workloads","observed":{"sites":0,"behind_a_setting_or_built_here":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"deployment configuration references secrets, never holds them","signal":"credentials_in_deploy_config","observed":{"files":0,"sites":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"not a frontend","signal":"public_env_secret","observed":{},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not a frontend","signal":"unsafe_html","observed":{},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not a frontend","signal":"source_maps_shipped","observed":{},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not a mobile app","signal":"cleartext_traffic","observed":{},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not a data or machine-learning repository","signal":"dataset_provenance","observed":{},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"every licence found in vendored code is permissive or weak-copyleft","signal":"license_copyleft_inherited","observed":{"vendored_paths":2975},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no packaging manifest states a licence","signal":"license_manifest_conflict","observed":{"manifests_checked":["package.json","pyproject.toml","Cargo.toml","composer.json"]},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"the licence is recognisable as Apache-2.0","signal":"license_grant_unclear","observed":{"class":"permissive","license":"Apache-2.0"},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no widely used compiled library is committed to the product","signal":"committed_native_libraries","observed":{"libraries":0,"recognised":[]},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"few or no feature flags in the history","signal":"flags_accumulating","observed":{"live":0,"retired":0,"flags_seen":0,"stale_over_a_year":0},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"not a running service","signal":"api_versions_coexisting","observed":{},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"a library, which keeps deprecated interfaces for its users","signal":"deprecations_lingering","observed":{},"dimension":"04","conclusive":false},{"reason":"few dependencies were added and dropped within 60 days","signal":"dependency_churn","observed":{"dependencies_seen":20,"added_in_two_years":3,"removed_within_60_days":0},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no platform was dropped from CI in the last two years","signal":"ci_platforms_dropped","observed":{"platforms_seen":["Linux","Windows","macOS"],"dropped_in_two_years":[]},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"the README's first screen states no end, move or freeze","signal":"repository_status","observed":{"statements":0},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"nothing says development happens elsewhere","signal":"development_elsewhere","observed":{"no_pr_statements":0,"mirror_statements":0,"replayed_commit_share":0.0},"dimension":"02","conclusive":true},{"reason":"the root licence has not changed in the history read","signal":"licence_changes","observed":{"licence_versions":0,"unreleased_changes":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no directory carries a separate paid-edition licence","signal":"paid_edition","observed":{"directories":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true},{"reason":"releases keep pace with development","signal":"releases_stopped","observed":{"median_gap_days":12.0,"days_since_last_tag":2,"commits_last_90_days":1121},"dimension":"04","conclusive":true},{"reason":"no file says one person maintains it","signal":"single_maintainer","observed":{"statements":0},"dimension":"03","conclusive":true},{"reason":"could not tell whether 85 published advisories affect the surveyed code: its version is only known to be at least 3.13.0; 1 is fixed in the surveyed commit, and the release users run is not placed by this history","signal":"project_advisories","observed":{"sources":["OSV by commit","GitHub repository advisories","NVD"],"affecting":0,"exploited":0,"advisories":90,"version_from":"the newest release tag in the surveyed history, 7,944 commits before the surveyed commit","fix_unreleased":0,"sources_failed":[],"version_unknown":85,"high_or_critical":0,"surveyed_version":"3.13.0","affecting_newest_release":46},"dimension":"05","conclusive":false},{"reason":"no affecting advisory is on CISA's Known Exploited list","signal":"project_exploited","observed":{"exploited":0},"dimension":"05","conclusive":true}],"schema_version":"1","repository_says":[{"line":null,"path":null,"text":"Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed","finding":"04.62"}],"surveyed_commit":{"says":"The newest release, v4.4.0, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v3.13.0","kinds":["not the release line"],"advice":"Read this report as describing that commit, not the release users run. Survey the release branch or tag as well.","newest_release":{"sha":"24d5157cd415ef396c8ecd40a2d08c4d7ad3da9f","tag":"v4.4.0"}},"provenance_disclosure":{"agents":["Claude","Cursor","GitHub Copilot"],"recent":{"since":"2025-10-22","until":"2026-10-22","window":"the last 12 months","measures":"share of lines added in the last 12 months to 2026-10-22 by commits declaring an AI agent as co-author: the same floor as the all-time share, over a shorter window","confidence":"low","ai_line_share":0.0697,"total_commits":2298,"ai_commit_share":0.0083,"confidence_basis":["7% of non-merge commits carry any trailer at all","low trailer coverage: the convention may not be in consistent use","21% of commits show author/committer date divergence, which is the shape of replayed history that can drop trailers","the declared share is neither decisive nor negligible, so the true figure is more sensitive to undeclared work"],"declared_commits":19,"total_lines_added":165708,"declared_lines_added":11551},"window":"the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026)","excluded":"lockfiles, vendored and generated paths are excluded from both measurements so that code nobody wrote cannot move the share","measures":"share of lines added by commits declaring an AI agent as co-author, as a proportion of the lines added in the most recent 50,000 commits (19 Apr 2012 to 22 Oct 2026) only; older history was not read","confidence":"moderate","measurable":true,"ai_line_share":0.0053,"total_commits":36764,"affects_rating":false,"excluded_lines":127,"ai_commit_share":0.0005,"confidence_basis":["3% of non-merge commits carry any trailer at all","low trailer coverage: the convention may not be in consistent use","no widespread author/committer date divergence"],"declared_commits":19,"total_lines_added":2182171,"surviving_ai_lines":null,"surviving_measures":"share of lines still present in the working tree that originate in an AI-declared commit; null unless the scan was run with --deep","commit_share_by_year":{"2012":0.0,"2013":0.0,"2014":0.0,"2015":0.0,"2016":0.0,"2017":0.0,"2018":0.0,"2019":0.0,"2020":0.0,"2021":0.0,"2022":0.0,"2023":0.0,"2024":0.0,"2025":0.0,"2026":0.0095},"declared_agent_names":["Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context)","Claude Sonnet 5","Copilot","Copilot Autofix powered by AI","Cursor","copilot-swe-agent[bot]"],"declared_lines_added":11551,"surviving_line_share":null,"floor_not_measurement":"This is a lower bound. It counts what the repository declares. Undeclared AI authorship is invisible here, and a single rebase removes the trailers this rests on. Absence of a declaration is absence of disclosure, not absence of AI authorship.","surviving_total_lines":null},"reliance":"An automated reading of a repository's code and its history up to one commit, with public advisory records. It may be wrong, it is not legal, financial, investment or security advice, and it does not replace diligence by a qualified person. It is provided for information: nobody may rely on it (Borehole's terms, section 3).","published_under_todays_rules":["3 findings from checks Borehole's calibration found wrong more often than right are no longer published.","The file and line of 5 credential-shaped matches are withheld. File and line are shown to whoever GitHub says controls this repository, signed in, and to a buyer of this report."]}