Read 2026-10-22
zenml-io/zenml: technical due diligence, read from its repository
What Borehole read in zenml-io/zenml's code and history at f3824df: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance | strong |
| Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity | strong |
| Product & Engineering Maturity | strong |
| Security & Reliability Posture | adequate |
| Observability & Operations | strong |
| Fit with the Acquirer | not assessable |
What the repository says
README.md:240: names Linux FoundationREADME.md:242: names CNCF
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance
strongsrc/zenml/zen_stores/sql_zen_store.py is 17,109 lines, 234× this codebase's median file
adequateThe median source file here is 73 lines. 46 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 17,109. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.
src/zenml/zen_stores/sql_zen_store.py:1 — 17,109 lines (234× median) |
src/zenml/client.py:1 — 9,782 lines (134× median) |
src/zenml/zen_stores/rest_zen_store.py:1 — 5,696 lines (78× median) |
src/zenml/cli/utils.py:1 — 4,235 lines (58× median) |
src/zenml/zen_stores/zen_store_interface.py:1 — 3,520 lines (48× median) |
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity
strongNo finding.
Product & Engineering Maturity
strongNo finding.
Security & Reliability Posture
adequate155 dependencies float, and no lockfile is committed
adequateDependency versions are declared as ranges and no lockfile is committed, so a build today does not necessarily produce what a build last month produced. That matters twice over in a transaction: the thing being bought cannot be reproduced exactly, and a compromised upstream release arrives without anyone choosing to take it.
examples/agent_comparison/requirements.txt:2 — any version |
examples/agent_comparison/requirements.txt:5 — >=0.5.0 |
examples/agent_comparison/requirements.txt:6 — >=0.3.0 |
examples/agent_comparison/requirements.txt:9 — >=1.3.0 |
examples/agent_comparison/requirements.txt:10 — >=1.5.0 |
The build runs third-party code it does not pin
adequate4 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day; 7 steps pipe a download straight into a shell. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.
.github/workflows/update-templates-to-examples.yml:46 — action pinned by tag |
.github/workflows/update-templates-to-examples.yml:120 — action pinned by tag |
.github/workflows/ci-slow.yml:145 — download piped into a shell |
119 of 288 migrations cannot be rolled back
adequate119 schema migrations (41%) have no working way back: an empty `downgrade`, a `down` that does nothing, or a data migration with no reverse. A bad deploy that includes one is recovered from a backup, not reverted. Ask when a restore was last rehearsed.
src/zenml/zen_stores/migrations/versions/0.33.0_release.py:21 — migration with no way back |
src/zenml/zen_stores/migrations/versions/0.34.0_release.py:21 — migration with no way back |
src/zenml/zen_stores/migrations/versions/0.35.0_release.py:21 — migration with no way back |
4 shell commands built from strings
adequate4 places run a command through a shell (`shell=True`, `os.system`, `exec` with a template) rather than passing arguments. Where any part comes from outside, it is command injection. Ask where each one's input comes from.
src/zenml/cli/integration.py:237 — command run through a shell |
src/zenml/integrations/spark/step_operators/spark_step_operator.py:256 — command run through a shell |
src/zenml/utils/pipeline_docker_image_builder.py:530 — command run through a shell |
1 deserialiser that can run code
adequate1 places read data with a deserialiser that executes what it reads (pickle). That is safe on data the system wrote itself and remote code execution on anything else. Ask where each one's input comes from.
src/zenml/integrations/huggingface/steps/accelerate_runner.py:127 — code-executing deserialiser |
1 of 2 Kubernetes workloads declare no resource limits
adequate1 workload manifests set no CPU or memory limits. One pod that leaks memory or spins can starve everything else on its node, and the scheduler cannot plan capacity for what it cannot see.
helm/templates/worker-deployments.yaml — workload with no limits |
6 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 2 high or critical
adequateThe newest was published on 2026-08-07. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. None of them affects the surveyed version. The record is incomplete: NVD: 2 records name zenml with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2024-28424, CVE-2024-4680).
| 2026-08-07: CVE-2026-68772 (high): ZenML 0.94.6 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the CloudpickleMaterializer component that allows attackers with write access to a shared artifac |
| 2026-07-24: CVE-2026-11922 (moderate): A vulnerability in zenml-io/zenml versions 0.57.0 through 0.94.2 allows an attacker to bypass rate-limiting on the `POST /api/v1/login` and self password-change |
| 2026-07-21: CVE-2026-11876 (moderate): In zenml-io/zenml version 0.94.2, the `GET /api/v1/stack-deployment/stack` endpoint (`get_deployed_stack`) lacks proper RBAC authorization checks, allowing any |
| 2025-10-05: GHSA-q92x-2x5g-h365 (moderate), fixed in 0.84.2: ZenML is vulnerable to Path Traversal through its `PathMaterializer` class |
| 2025-03-20: GHSA-6gmf-2369-c76c (high), fixed in 0.68.0: ZenML unauthenticated DoS via Multipart Boundry |
Observability & Operations
strongNo error reporter is wired in
adequateNothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.
| no error reporter initialised |
Fit with the Acquirer
not assessableNot rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.
Read more, or read your own
The full report on zenml-io/zenml: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.
Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.