Read 2026-10-04
umbraco/umbraco-cms: technical due diligence, read from its repository
What Borehole read in umbraco/umbraco-cms's code and history at 6ce8875: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance | adequate |
| Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity | strong |
| Product & Engineering Maturity | strong |
| Security & Reliability Posture | adequate |
| Observability & Operations | adequate |
| Fit with the Acquirer | not assessable |
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance
adequatesrc/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/src/packages/core/icon-registry/icons.ts is 3,763 lines, 121× this codebase's median file
adequateThe median source file here is 31 lines. 57 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 3,763. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/src/packages/core/icon-registry/icons.ts:1 — 3,763 lines (121× median) |
src/Umbraco.Core/Strings/Utf8ToAsciiConverter.cs:1 — 3,632 lines (117× median) |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/src/assets/lang/en.ts:1 — 3,250 lines (104× median) |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/src/assets/lang/zh.ts:1 — 3,086 lines (99× median) |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/src/assets/lang/da.ts:1 — 3,013 lines (97× median) |
1 base image floats: no version, or `latest`
adequate1 of 4 `FROM` lines in product Dockerfiles name an image without a version, or with `latest`. Each build pulls whatever the registry serves that day, so the image that ships can change without a commit, and last month's build cannot be reproduced. Pin a version, or a digest.
templates/UmbracoProject/Dockerfile:23 — base image without a version |
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity
strongTests are retried until they pass
adequateThe suite is configured to retry failing tests (src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/playwright.config.ts). A retry turns a flaky test green without saying why it failed, so a green build means the tests passed eventually. Ask how many retries a typical run needs, and which tests need them.
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/playwright.config.ts:29 — test retry |
Product & Engineering Maturity
strong43 files still carry code deprecated more than two years ago
adequate43 files were marked deprecated over two years ago and still are, the oldest since Jan 2023. A deprecation is a promise to remove. Ask what still depends on these, and whether removing them is scheduled.
src/Umbraco.Core/Services/DataTypeService.cs — deprecated since Jan 2023 |
src/Umbraco.Core/Services/IDataTypeService.cs — deprecated since Feb 2023 |
src/Umbraco.Web.Website/Routing/UmbracoRouteValueTransformer.cs — deprecated since Feb 2023 |
src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/PropertyEditors/TagsPropertyEditor.cs — deprecated since Feb 2023 |
src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Security/BackOfficeUserStore.cs — deprecated since Feb 2023 |
Security & Reliability Posture
adequateNone of the standard security guard rails are configured
adequateThere is no disclosure policy, no automated dependency updates, no named code owners and no pre-commit configuration. None of these is load-bearing on its own. Their collective absence says that security posture here is whatever the current team happens to remember to do, which is not a posture that survives the team changing.
| checked 5 kinds of guard rail across 18,275 tracked files; 0 present |
1 Dockerfile runs the application as root
adequateNo USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.
templates/UmbracoDockerCompose/Database/Dockerfile — runs as root |
5 environment files are committed
adequatesrc/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/.env, src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/.env.production, src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/.env.staging and more are tracked in git. Environment files are where credentials usually live, and committing one usually means nobody decided how secrets reach the running application. Whatever is in it is in the history for good. Check 05.1 says whether it holds anything credential-shaped.
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/.env — committed environment file |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/.env.production — committed environment file |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/.env.staging — committed environment file |
4 SQL statements built from strings
adequate4 places in product code build SQL by formatting or joining strings rather than passing parameters. In each, what the code shows going in is a table or column name, a constant, or something the line does not show, not a request's value. Ask whether any value reaches these strings, rather than a parameter.
src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/Repositories/Implement/PublishableContentRepositoryBase.cs:1162 — SQL built from a string |
src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/Repositories/Implement/PublishableContentRepositoryBase.cs:1167 — SQL built from a string |
src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/Repositories/Implement/PublishableContentRepositoryBase.cs:1426 — SQL built from a string |
4 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 1 high or critical in what ships
adequate4 of 209 locked dependencies match 24 published advisories in OSV, 4 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/package-lock.json — @tiptap/core 3.29.2: GHSA-j95f-988m-3j2f (high), fixed in 3.30.5 |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/package-lock.json — js-yaml 4.2.0: GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh (high), fixed in 4.3.2; reached only by the build |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/package-lock.json — dompurify 3.2.7: GHSA-39q2-94rc-95cp (moderate), fixed in 3.4.0 |
27 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 5 high or critical
adequateThe newest was published on 2026-08-18. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 10 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 18.2.0. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version. The record is incomplete: NVD: 5 records name umbraco-cms with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2018-17256, CVE-2020-5809, CVE-2020-5810, …).
| 2026-08-18: GHSA-w5q3-9wf8-43gg (moderate), fixed in 17.6.2: Insufficient authorization on Management API search endpoints |
| 2026-08-18: GHSA-f7m5-5x7g-2p52 (high), fixed in 17.6.2: Incorrect authorization lets Content-only backoffice users modify Templates, enabling remote code execution |
| 2026-07-07: GHSA-wr57-hqmp-fgvh (high), fixed in 13.15.1: Delivery API leaks protected (Public Access) content through Content Picker / Multi-Node Tree Picker expansion |
| 2026-05-15: GHSA-vr9v-27gg-qgx4 (moderate), fixed in 17.4.0: XSS/HTML Injection in Umbraco Backoffice confirmation dialog |
| 2026-05-15: GHSA-2qjj-h6wp-c7h7 (moderate), fixed in 13.14.0 AND 17.4.0: Open Redirect Vulnerability in Surface Controllers |
Observability & Operations
adequateThe service logs with print: 261 calls against 1 logger calls
adequate261 `print` or `console.log` calls in the service's code, and 1 calls through a logger. Printed lines carry no level and no context, cannot be switched off, and are hard to find again in production.
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/devops/check-duplicate-class-names/index.js:20 — print used for logging |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/devops/check-duplicate-class-names/index.js:22 — print used for logging |
src/Umbraco.Web.UI.Client/devops/check-duplicate-class-names/index.js:25 — print used for logging |
No error reporter is wired in
adequateNothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.
| no error reporter initialised |
Sends usage data to telemetry.umbraco.com by default
adequatesrc/Umbraco.Infrastructure/BackgroundJobs/Jobs/ReportSiteJob.cs sends to telemetry.umbraco.com, and src/Umbraco.Core/Manifest/PackageManifest.cs leaves reporting on as shipped. Every installation reports to the vendor unless its operator turns this off. For a buyer running it inside their own product, that is an outbound data flow to a third party: ask what is sent, how often, and whether the buyer's customers were told.
src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/BackgroundJobs/Jobs/ReportSiteJob.cs:74 — reports to telemetry.umbraco.com |
src/Umbraco.Core/Manifest/PackageManifest.cs:38 — the reporting setting is on by default |
1 of 1 deployed images carry no version, or `latest`
adequate1 images in the deployment configuration are named without a version or as `latest`. A redeploy can change the software without a commit, a rollback has nothing to roll back to, and nobody can say from the repository what is running.
templates/UmbracoDockerCompose/docker-compose.yml:27 — image without a version |
Fit with the Acquirer
not assessableNot rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.
Read more, or read your own
The full report on umbraco/umbraco-cms: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.
Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.