Borehole · Project · free tier
typelevel/skunk
Free reading: not for reliance
1045d3b · 2,526 commits · 320 files
Read 2026-11-07

typelevel/skunk: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in typelevel/skunk's code and history at 1045d3b: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsstrong
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

modules/core/shared/src/main/scala-2/SqlState.scala is 1,226 lines, 27× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 45 lines. 2 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 1,226. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
modules/core/shared/src/main/scala-2/SqlState.scala:1 — 1,226 lines (27× median)
modules/core/shared/src/main/scala-3/SqlState.scala:1 — 1,216 lines (27× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong
04.38

12 files still carry code deprecated more than two years ago

adequate

12 files were marked deprecated over two years ago and still are, the oldest since Apr 2023. A deprecation is a promise to remove. Ask what still depends on these, and whether removing them is scheduled.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.2

None of the standard security guard rails are configured

adequate

There is no disclosure policy, no automated dependency updates, no named code owners and no pre-commit configuration. None of these is load-bearing on its own. Their collective absence says that security posture here is whatever the current team happens to remember to do, which is not a posture that survives the team changing.

Evidence
checked 5 kinds of guard rail across 320 tracked files; 0 present
05.6

1 Dockerfile runs the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

Evidence
world/Dockerfile — runs as root
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

4 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/ci.yml:43 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/ci.yml:271 — action pinned by tag

Observability & Operations

strong
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised
06.18

1 of 4 deployed images carry no version, or `latest`

adequate

1 images in the deployment configuration are named without a version or as `latest`. A redeploy can change the software without a commit, a rollback has nothing to roll back to, and nobody can say from the repository what is running.

Evidence
docker-compose.yml:60 — image without a version

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on typelevel/skunk: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.