Borehole · Project · free tier
turbot/steampipe
Free reading: not for reliance
103201b · 3,636 commits · 736 files
Read 2026-10-23

turbot/steampipe: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in turbot/steampipe's code and history at 103201b: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenanceadequate
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed
  • LICENSE: Relicensed: MPL-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2021-05-20)
  • .gitmodules:1: 3 submodule(s) this survey does not read: tests/acceptance/lib/bats-core, tests/acceptance/lib/bats-assert, tests/acceptance/lib/bats-support

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

adequate

No finding.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.5

Effort is shifting from building to rewriting

adequate

Deleted lines per line added rose from 0.54 to 7.31 between the first and second halves of this history. Rework is normal and often healthy, but a rising ratio means an increasing share of the team's time is spent replacing code that already exists rather than building what does not. Whether that is deliberate repayment or churn is a question for the team.

Evidence
first half 0.54, second half 7.31 (split 2023-11-28)
04.62

Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

adequate

The newest release, v2.4.8, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v2.4.7. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too.

Evidence
tag v2.4.8

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.20

9 SQL statements built from strings

adequate

9 places in product code build SQL by formatting or joining strings rather than passing parameters. In each, what the code shows going in is a table or column name, a constant, or something the line does not show, not a request's value. Ask whether any value reaches these strings, rather than a parameter.

Evidence
pkg/db/db_client/db_client_search_path.go:122 — SQL built from a string
pkg/db/db_common/cache_control.go:36 — SQL built from a string
pkg/db/db_common/cache_control.go:48 — SQL built from a string
05.26

4 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 3 high or critical

adequate

4 of 215 locked dependencies match 8 published advisories in OSV, 3 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.

Evidence
go.mod — github.com/containerd/containerd v1.7.35: GO-2026-5064 (high)
go.mod — go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace v1.35.0: GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg (low), fixed in 1.45.0
go.mod — go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc v1.35.0: GHSA-8wmf-6v46-5gfg (low), fixed in 1.45.0
05.60

Relicensed: MPL-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2021-05-20)

adequate

The root licence changed 1 time(s). The latest terms restrict what users, hosts or a buyer may do in ways the earlier ones did not. Code taken under the old terms stays under them, so both matter in diligence.

Evidence
LICENSE — MPL-2.0 from 2021-01-17
LICENSE — AGPL-3.0 from 2021-05-20

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.8

One request cannot be followed through the logs

adequate

Nothing in the service carries a request or correlation id, and there is no tracing. When a customer reports a failure, the log lines that belong to their request cannot be picked out from everyone else's.

Evidence
no request id, correlation id or tracing found
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised
06.18

3 of 3 deployed images carry no version, or `latest`

adequate

3 images in the deployment configuration are named without a version or as `latest`. A redeploy can change the software without a commit, a rollback has nothing to roll back to, and nobody can say from the repository what is running.

Evidence
pkg/otel/docker-compose.yaml:5 — image without a version
pkg/otel/docker-compose.yaml:13 — image without a version
pkg/otel/docker-compose.yaml:27 — image without a version

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on turbot/steampipe: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.