Borehole · Project · free tier
sxyazi/yazi
Free reading: not for reliance
fde2234 · 1,543 commits · 1,468 files
Read 2026-10-04

sxyazi/yazi: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in sxyazi/yazi's code and history at fde2234: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Posturenot assessable
Observability & Operationsnot assessable
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • .github/pull_request_template.md:22: states a policy on AI-generated contributions

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong

No finding.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate
02.3

Tests cover a thin slice of the codebase

adequate

32 test files against 1,350 source files (2.4%). This does not measure whether the tests are good, only whether enough of them exist for the codebase to be changed safely by someone who did not write it — which is exactly the situation after an acquisition.

Evidence
32 test files / 1,350 source files

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.19

0% of bug fixes add or change a test

adequate

Of 253 fixes in the last 24 months, 0 touched a test. A fix without the test that would have caught the bug can quietly come back, and the suite never learns from what went wrong.

Evidence
0 of 253

Security & Reliability Posture

not assessable
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

15 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day; 1 step pipes a download straight into a shell. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/cachix.yml:21 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/cachix.yml:24 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/test.yml:50 — download piped into a shell
05.26

3 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities

adequate

3 of 548 locked dependencies match 3 published advisories in OSV. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.

Evidence
Cargo.lock — bincode 1.3.3: RUSTSEC-2025-0141 (unrated)
Cargo.lock — paste 1.0.15: RUSTSEC-2024-0436 (unrated)
Cargo.lock — rsa 0.10.0-rc.18: RUSTSEC-2023-0071 (unrated)

Observability & Operations

not assessable

Not rated: only 4 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on sxyazi/yazi: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.