Borehole · Project · free tier
streamdal/plumber
Free reading: not for reliance
0852448 · 1,269 commits · 6,011 files
Read 2026-11-03

streamdal/plumber: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in streamdal/plumber's code and history at 0852448: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsstrong
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong

No finding.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong
04.5

Effort is shifting from building to rewriting

adequate

Deleted lines per line added rose from 0.48 to 1.29 between the first and second halves of this history. Rework is normal and often healthy, but a rising ratio means an increasing share of the team's time is spent replacing code that already exists rather than building what does not. Whether that is deliberate repayment or churn is a question for the team.

Evidence
first half 0.48, second half 1.29 (split 2022-10-12)
04.17

Go 1.20 is past end of life

adequate

The code is pinned to Go 1.20 (end of life 2024-02-06). None of these receives security fixes any more; the first stopped on 2024-02-06. Moving off an unsupported runtime is rarely a one-line change, so a buyer should ask whether the upgrade is planned and what it touches.

Evidence
Dockerfile — Go 1.20, end of life 2024-02-06
04.38

73 files still carry code deprecated more than two years ago

adequate

73 files were marked deprecated over two years ago and still are, the oldest since Aug 2020. A deprecation is a promise to remove. Ask what still depends on these, and whether removing them is scheduled.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.2

None of the standard security guard rails are configured

adequate

There is no disclosure policy, no automated dependency updates, no named code owners and no pre-commit configuration. None of these is load-bearing on its own. Their collective absence says that security posture here is whatever the current team happens to remember to do, which is not a posture that survives the team changing.

Evidence
checked 5 kinds of guard rail across 6,011 tracked files; 0 present
05.6

1 Dockerfile runs the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

Evidence
Dockerfile — runs as root
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

8 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/master-test.yaml:18 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/release.yaml:15 — action pinned by tag
05.26

7 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 2 high or critical in what ships

adequate

7 of 174 locked dependencies match 8 published advisories in OSV, 6 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.

Evidence
go.mod — google.golang.org/grpc v1.60.1: GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 (critical), fixed in 1.79.3
go.mod — github.com/sirupsen/logrus v1.8.1: GHSA-4f99-4q7p-p3gh (high), fixed in 1.8.3
go.mod — github.com/golang-jwt/jwt v3.2.1+incompatible: GHSA-mh63-6h87-95cp (high)

Observability & Operations

strong
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised
06.18

5 of 8 deployed images carry no version, or `latest`

adequate

5 images in the deployment configuration are named without a version or as `latest`. A redeploy can change the software without a commit, a rollback has nothing to roll back to, and nobody can say from the repository what is running.

Evidence
docker-compose.yml:14 — image without a version
docker-compose.yml:31 — image without a version
docker-compose.yml:58 — image without a version

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on streamdal/plumber: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.