Borehole · Project · free tier
statamic/cms
Free reading: not for reliance
15b522f · 16,449 commits · 5,160 files
Read 2026-10-04

statamic/cms: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in statamic/cms's code and history at 15b522f: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsnot assessable
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed
  • LICENSE.md:1: The licence is a commercial licence: source available, not open source

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

src/Modifiers/CoreModifiers.php is 3,329 lines, 56× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 59 lines. 13 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 3,329. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong
04.62

Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

adequate

The newest release, v6.34.1, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v6.22.0. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too.

Evidence
tag v6.34.1

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.22

4 deserialisers that can run code

adequate

4 places read data with a deserialiser that executes what it reads (PHP `unserialize`). That is safe on data the system wrote itself and remote code execution on anything else. Ask where each one's input comes from.

Evidence
src/StaticCaching/NoCache/DatabaseSession.php:43 — code-executing deserialiser
src/StaticCaching/NoCache/Session.php:59 — code-executing deserialiser
src/View/Slot.php:177 — code-executing deserialiser
05.26

3 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 9 high or critical in what ships

adequate

3 of 294 locked dependencies match 16 published advisories in OSV, 9 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.

Evidence
package-lock.json — axios 1.18.1: GHSA-3pq3-5fj3-cg6v (high), fixed in 1.20.0
package-lock.json — brace-expansion 2.1.4: GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p (high), fixed in 2.1.5
package-lock.json — dompurify 3.4.13: GHSA-p98j-92pf-mc4p (low), fixed in 3.4.16
05.48

85 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it

adequate

85 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.

05.66

The licence is a commercial licence: source available, not open source

adequate

LICENSE.md grants a commercial licence: source available, not open source; use limited to what each licence grants. The reading comes from the licence's own title and clauses. Whether the terms fit the buyer's intended use, and whether any paid licence transfers with the code, is a question for counsel and the licensor.

Evidence
LICENSE.md:1 — 19 lines, LicenseRef-Commercial
05.65

39 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 12 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-09-16. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 36 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 6.22.0. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version.

Evidence
2026-09-16: GHSA-wj57-j7rq-v647 (moderate), fixed in 6.33.0: IP address protection scheme bypassable via a forwarded header
2026-09-16: GHSA-qcj3-3rx2-4c2j (moderate), fixed in 6.31.0: User enumeration via timing discrepancy in login
2026-08-14: GHSA-33fx-2776-vvp5 (high), fixed in 6.27.2: Unsafe method invocation via Antlers template resolution allows account takeover and data destruction
2026-08-14: GHSA-7qmf-j24c-x6cx (moderate), fixed in 6.27.2: SVG sanitization bypassed for uploads whose file extension is not normalized
2026-07-09: GHSA-qhr7-v3xp-vw9m (moderate), fixed in 6.24.2: Missing file upload validation on frontend forms allows uploading disallowed file types

Observability & Operations

not assessable

Not rated: only 5 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on statamic/cms: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.