Borehole · Project · free tier
smallstep/cli
Free reading: not for reliance
9c05f5c · 4,115 commits · 333 files
Read 2026-10-23

smallstep/cli: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in smallstep/cli's code and history at 9c05f5c: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenanceadequate
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

adequate
01.6

command/oauth/cmd.go is 1,325 lines, 10× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 122 lines. 1 file exceed 1,220 lines, the largest being 1,325. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
command/oauth/cmd.go:1 — 1,325 lines (10× median)
01.25

1 base image floats: no version, or `latest`

adequate

1 of 2 `FROM` lines in product Dockerfiles name an image without a version, or with `latest`. Each build pulls whatever the registry serves that day, so the image that ships can change without a commit, and last month's build cannot be reproduced. Pin a version, or a digest.

Evidence
docker/Dockerfile:22 — base image without a version

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong
04.5

Effort is shifting from building to rewriting

adequate

Deleted lines per line added rose from 0.54 to 1.94 between the first and second halves of this history. Rework is normal and often healthy, but a rising ratio means an increasing share of the team's time is spent replacing code that already exists rather than building what does not. Whether that is deliberate repayment or churn is a question for the team.

Evidence
first half 0.54, second half 1.94 (split 2022-09-03)

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.1

1 credential-shaped string committed to the tree

adequate

Matches for Google OAuth client secret appear in tracked files outside test and fixture paths. They stay in the history even after they leave the tree, so what matters is whether each was rotated. The code cannot tell whether any of them is live, and that decides whether this matters: none sits in production configuration, and none is in a format its provider keeps for live keys. Is any of these live? Show that each was rotated after it was committed, and when. 6 other matchs set aside: expired tokens, licence tokens a vendor verifies with a public key, or placeholder text where a key would go. None grants access to anything.

Evidence
Google OAuth client secret pattern matched
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

7 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/actionci.yml:21 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/ci.yml:25 — action pinned by tag
05.13

4 outbound calls can wait forever

adequate

4 HTTP calls use a client with no timeout (Python `requests` without `timeout=`, or Go's default client). When a dependency slows down, each one holds a worker until the connection gives up, and enough of them take the service down with the dependency.

Evidence
command/certificate/verify.go:267 — outbound call without a timeout
command/crl/inspect.go:125 — outbound call without a timeout
command/oauth/cmd.go:695 — outbound call without a timeout

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.7

The service logs with print: 156 calls against 0 logger calls

adequate

156 `print` or `console.log` calls in the service's code, and 0 calls through a logger. Printed lines carry no level and no context, cannot be switched off, and are hard to find again in production.

Evidence
command/api/token/create.go:142 — print used for logging
command/base64/base64.go:113 — print used for logging
command/ca/acme/eab/list.go:142 — print used for logging
06.8

One request cannot be followed through the logs

adequate

Nothing in the service carries a request or correlation id, and there is no tracing. When a customer reports a failure, the log lines that belong to their request cannot be picked out from everyone else's.

Evidence
no request id, correlation id or tracing found
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on smallstep/cli: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.