Borehole · Project · free tier
sharkdp/bat
Free reading: not for reliance
4987f76 · 4,031 commits · 1,007 files
Read 2026-10-04

sharkdp/bat: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in sharkdp/bat's code and history at 4987f76: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenanceadequate
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsnot assessable
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • .gitmodules:1: 93 submodule(s) this survey does not read: assets/syntaxes/02_Extra/Elixir, assets/syntaxes/01_Packages, assets/syntaxes/02_Extra/TOML

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

adequate
01.6

src/vscreen.rs is 1,170 lines, 14× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 81 lines. 2 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 1,170. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
src/vscreen.rs:1 — 1,170 lines (14× median)
src/printer.rs:1 — 1,026 lines (12× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate

No finding.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.3

16 dependencies float, and no lockfile is committed

adequate

Dependency versions are declared as ranges and no lockfile is committed, so a build today does not necessarily produce what a build last month produced. That matters twice over in a transaction: the thing being bought cannot be reproduced exactly, and a compromised upstream release arrives without anyone choosing to take it.

05.26

4 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities

adequate

4 of 317 locked dependencies match 4 published advisories in OSV. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.

Evidence
Cargo.lock — bincode 1.3.3: RUSTSEC-2025-0141 (unrated)
Cargo.lock — faster-hex 0.10.0: RUSTSEC-2026-0306 (unrated), fixed in 0.10.1
Cargo.lock — proc-macro-error2 2.0.1: RUSTSEC-2026-0173 (unrated)

Observability & Operations

not assessable

Not rated: only 4 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on sharkdp/bat: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.