Borehole · Project · free tier
psf/black
Free reading: not for reliance
8d5a2d9 · 2,346 commits · 495 files
Read 2026-10-04

psf/black: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in psf/black's code and history at 8d5a2d9: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsnot assessable
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

profiling/list_huge.py is 22,432 lines, 448× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 50 lines. 11 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 22,432. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
profiling/list_huge.py:1 — 22,432 lines (448× median)
profiling/dict_big.py:1 — 8,002 lines (160× median)
profiling/list_big.py:1 — 4,001 lines (80× median)
src/black/trans.py:1 — 2,662 lines (53× median)
src/black/linegen.py:1 — 2,463 lines (49× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong

No finding.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.6

1 Dockerfile runs the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

Evidence
Dockerfile — runs as root
05.22

3 deserialisers that can run code

adequate

3 places read data with a deserialiser that executes what it reads (pickle). That is safe on data the system wrote itself and remote code execution on anything else. Ask where each one's input comes from.

Evidence
src/black/cache.py:80 — code-executing deserialiser
src/blib2to3/pgen2/grammar.py:124 — code-executing deserialiser
src/blib2to3/pgen2/grammar.py:129 — code-executing deserialiser
05.65

2 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 2 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-03-12. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. None of them affects the surveyed version. The record is incomplete: NVD: 46 records name black with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2002-0446, CVE-2008-2684, CVE-2008-3206, …).

Evidence
2026-03-12: GHSA-3936-cmfr-pm3m (high), fixed in 26.3.1: Black: Arbitrary file writes from unsanitized user input in cache file name
2026-03-06: PYSEC-2026-2120 (high), fixed in 26.3.0:

Observability & Operations

not assessable

Not rated: only 5 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on psf/black: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.