Read 2026-10-23
prestashop/prestashop: technical due diligence, read from its repository
What Borehole read in prestashop/prestashop's code and history at 23e02bd: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance | strong |
| Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity | strong |
| Product & Engineering Maturity | strong |
| Security & Reliability Posture | adequate |
| Observability & Operations | strong |
| Fit with the Acquirer | not assessable |
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance
strongjs/jquery/ui/jquery-ui.js is 15,004 lines, 238× this codebase's median file
adequateThe median source file here is 63 lines. 61 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 15,004. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.
js/jquery/ui/jquery-ui.js:1 — 15,004 lines (238× median) |
js/tiny_mce/themes/mobile/theme.js:1 — 12,772 lines (202× median) |
classes/Product.php:1 — 8,333 lines (132× median) |
classes/Cart.php:1 — 5,292 lines (84× median) |
js/jquery/plugins/jstree/jquery.jstree.js:1 — 4,552 lines (72× median) |
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity
strongNo finding.
Product & Engineering Maturity
strong82 files still carry code deprecated more than two years ago
adequate82 files were marked deprecated over two years ago and still are, the oldest since Dec 2020. A deprecation is a promise to remove. Ask what still depends on these, and whether removing them is scheduled.
src/Core/Util/DateTime/DateTime.php — deprecated since Dec 2020 |
src/PrestaShopBundle/Controller/Admin/Improve/Design/CmsPageController.php — deprecated since Jan 2021 |
classes/Carrier.php — deprecated since Jan 2021 |
classes/Combination.php — deprecated since Feb 2021 |
classes/stock/StockAvailable.php — deprecated since Feb 2021 |
Security & Reliability Posture
adequate1 environment file is committed
adequate.env is tracked in git. Environment files are where credentials usually live, and committing one usually means nobody decided how secrets reach the running application. Whatever is in it is in the history for good. Check 05.1 says whether it holds anything credential-shaped.
.env — committed environment file |
The build runs third-party code it does not pin
adequate13 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.
.github/workflows/add-issue-to-project.yml:9 — action pinned by tag |
.github/workflows/api-module.yml:32 — action pinned by tag |
4 deserialisers that can run code
adequate4 places read data with a deserialiser that executes what it reads (PHP `unserialize`). That is safe on data the system wrote itself and remote code execution on anything else. Ask where each one's input comes from.
classes/Tools.php:3910 — code-executing deserialiser |
classes/Tools.php:3914 — code-executing deserialiser |
install-dev/classes/session.php:90 — code-executing deserialiser |
25 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 10 high or critical in what ships
adequate25 of 572 locked dependencies match 65 published advisories in OSV, 32 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.
admin-dev/themes/default/package-lock.json — form-data 4.0.0: GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 (critical), fixed in 4.0.4; reached only by the build |
admin-dev/themes/new-theme/package-lock.json — @vue/server-renderer 3.5.9: GHSA-g2v6-rqmx-r4w6 (high), fixed in 3.5.42 |
admin-dev/themes/new-theme/package-lock.json — http-cache-semantics 4.1.1: GHSA-ch52-4w7c-c8xp (high) |
122 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it
adequate122 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.
admin-dev/filemanager/js/dropzone.min.js:1 — HTML from a variable |
admin-dev/filemanager/js/dropzone.min.js:1 — HTML from a variable |
admin-dev/filemanager/js/jquery.js:4 — HTML from a variable |
6 vendored components with no licence
adequateThird-party code is committed into this repository without any statement of the terms it arrived under. Unknown terms are harder to deal with than inconvenient ones: an awkward licence can be complied with, an absent one cannot. Each of these needs its origin established before the code changes hands.
admin-dev/themes/default/css/vendor/nv.d3.css — 1 tracked files, no licence file |
admin-dev/themes/default/css/vendor/titatoggle-min.css — 1 tracked files, no licence file |
admin-dev/themes/default/js/vendor/nv.d3.min.js — 1 tracked files, no licence file |
admin-dev/themes/default/scss/vendor/_animate.sass — 1 tracked files, no licence file |
js/vendor/bower.json — 1 tracked files, no licence file |
js/vendor/d3.v3.min.js — 1 tracked files, no licence file |
Licence text does not match a standard licence
adequateLICENSE.md exists but its text does not match any standard licence. A bespoke or hand-edited licence is not wrong, but it cannot be cleared by recognising its name: counsel has to read it, and until they do neither side knows precisely what rights transfer with the code.
LICENSE.md:1 — 6 lines, unrecognised |
23 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 9 high or critical
adequateThe newest was published on 2026-09-16. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 16 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 9.2.0. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version. The record is incomplete: NVD: 43 records name PrestaShop with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2008-6503, CVE-2011-4544, CVE-2011-4545, …).
| 2026-09-16: CVE-2026-92809 (moderate): PrestaShop psgdpr versions through 1.4.3 fail to validate that GDPR consent log entries are attributed to the authenticated customer. Authenticated attackers ca |
| 2026-09-16: CVE-2026-92810 (moderate): PrestaShop blockwishlist through 3.0.2 fails to validate wishlist ownership in the getUrlByIdWishListAction method, allowing authenticated customers to retrieve |
| 2026-09-07: CVE-2026-84186 (moderate): Vulnerability involving incorrect access control in the Tools::getRemoteAddr() function in PrestaShop, which allows the client’s IP address to be spoofed via th |
| 2026-08-18: GHSA-xrwj-pq6w-f8m4 (high), fixed in 8.2.8: Server-Side Request Forgery through image URLs in the CSV import |
| 2026-08-18: GHSA-2cr4-vw9p-pjvf (high), fixed in 8.2.8: Client IP address can be spoofed through the X-Forwarded-For header |
Observability & Operations
strongNo finding.
Fit with the Acquirer
not assessableNot rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.
Read more, or read your own
The full report on prestashop/prestashop: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.
Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.