Borehole · Project · free tier
openstatushq/openstatus
Free reading: not for reliance
dec0730 · 2,546 commits · 4,444 files
Read 2026-10-04

openstatushq/openstatus: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in openstatushq/openstatus's code and history at dec0730: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsstrong
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

packages/tinybird/src/client.ts is 3,669 lines, 53× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 68 lines. 7 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 3,669. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
packages/tinybird/src/client.ts:1 — 3,669 lines (53× median)
apps/server/src/routes/rpc/handlers/status-page/index.ts:1 — 1,705 lines (25× median)
packages/api/src/router/statusPage.ts:1 — 1,622 lines (23× median)
apps/server/src/routes/slack/handler.ts:1 — 1,387 lines (20× median)
apps/dashboard/src/components/forms/components/form-components.tsx:1 — 1,307 lines (19× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate
02.4

Nothing in the history is tagged as a release

adequate

Across 3.3 years of history there is not one tag. There may still be a deployment process, but this repository holds no record of what shipped when — which is the record a buyer needs to reconstruct an incident or a regression after the fact.

Evidence
0 tags across 2,546 commits and 1202 days
02.24

8% of recent commits change more than 2,000 lines

adequate

127 of 1567 commits in the last 24 months changed over 2,000 lines of code, not counting reformatting, renames, vendored or generated code. A change that size is rarely reviewed line by line. Ask how they were reviewed, and what made them that large.

Evidence
127 commits over 2,000 lines

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.3

92 direct dependencies in a single manifest

adequate

apps/dashboard/package.json declares 92 direct dependencies. Each one is a maintenance obligation, a supply-chain surface and a potential licence question that transfers with the asset. The count says nothing about whether any given dependency was a good choice; it says how many such choices a buyer inherits.

Evidence
apps/dashboard/package.json — 92 declared
apps/web/package.json — 81 declared
apps/status-page/package.json — 68 declared
apps/server/package.json — 63 declared
04.17

Go 1.25 is past end of life

adequate

The code is pinned to Go 1.25 (end of life 2026-08-11). None of these receives security fixes any more; the first stopped on 2026-08-11. Moving off an unsupported runtime is rarely a one-line change, so a buyer should ask whether the upgrade is planned and what it touches.

Evidence
apps/ssh-server/Dockerfile — Go 1.25, end of life 2026-08-11

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.6

4 Dockerfiles run the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

Evidence
apps/checker/Dockerfile — runs as root
apps/railway-proxy/Dockerfile — runs as root
apps/screenshot-service/Dockerfile — runs as root
apps/ssh-server/Dockerfile — runs as root
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

13 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/api-preview.yml:38 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/api-preview.yml:77 — action pinned by tag
05.13

2 outbound calls can wait forever

adequate

2 HTTP calls use a client with no timeout (Python `requests` without `timeout=`, or Go's default client). When a dependency slows down, each one holds a worker until the connection gives up, and enough of them take the service down with the dependency.

Evidence
apps/checker/handlers/handler.go:19 — outbound call without a timeout
apps/ssh-server/main.go:73 — outbound call without a timeout
05.26

18 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 6 high or critical in what ships

adequate

18 of 1,873 locked dependencies match 25 published advisories in OSV, 9 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.

Evidence
apps/checker/go.mod — google.golang.org/grpc v1.79.1: GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 (critical), fixed in 1.79.3
pnpm-lock.yaml — next 16.3.5: GHSA-vcvr-r3jv-pc5j (critical), fixed in 16.3.6
apps/private-location/go.mod — google.golang.org/grpc v1.77.0: GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 (critical), fixed in 1.79.3
05.48

9 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it

adequate

9 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.

Observability & Operations

strong
06.18

9 of 12 deployed images carry no version, or `latest`

adequate

9 images in the deployment configuration are named without a version or as `latest`. A redeploy can change the software without a commit, a rollback has nothing to roll back to, and nobody can say from the repository what is running.

Evidence
charts/openstatus/values.yaml:97 — image without a version
charts/openstatus/values.yaml:110 — image without a version
charts/openstatus/values.yaml:123 — image without a version
06.33

3 of 4 deployments run a single replica

adequate

3 deployments set `replicas: 1`, and nothing (an autoscaler, a disruption budget) adds more. Every deploy and every node drain is downtime, and the availability the buyer inherits has a ceiling.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on openstatushq/openstatus: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.