Read 2026-10-04
openstatushq/openstatus: technical due diligence, read from its repository
What Borehole read in openstatushq/openstatus's code and history at dec0730: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance | strong |
| Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity | adequate |
| Product & Engineering Maturity | adequate |
| Security & Reliability Posture | adequate |
| Observability & Operations | strong |
| Fit with the Acquirer | not assessable |
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance
strongpackages/tinybird/src/client.ts is 3,669 lines, 53× this codebase's median file
adequateThe median source file here is 68 lines. 7 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 3,669. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.
packages/tinybird/src/client.ts:1 — 3,669 lines (53× median) |
apps/server/src/routes/rpc/handlers/status-page/index.ts:1 — 1,705 lines (25× median) |
packages/api/src/router/statusPage.ts:1 — 1,622 lines (23× median) |
apps/server/src/routes/slack/handler.ts:1 — 1,387 lines (20× median) |
apps/dashboard/src/components/forms/components/form-components.tsx:1 — 1,307 lines (19× median) |
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity
adequateNothing in the history is tagged as a release
adequateAcross 3.3 years of history there is not one tag. There may still be a deployment process, but this repository holds no record of what shipped when — which is the record a buyer needs to reconstruct an incident or a regression after the fact.
| 0 tags across 2,546 commits and 1202 days |
8% of recent commits change more than 2,000 lines
adequate127 of 1567 commits in the last 24 months changed over 2,000 lines of code, not counting reformatting, renames, vendored or generated code. A change that size is rarely reviewed line by line. Ask how they were reviewed, and what made them that large.
| 127 commits over 2,000 lines |
Product & Engineering Maturity
adequate92 direct dependencies in a single manifest
adequateapps/dashboard/package.json declares 92 direct dependencies. Each one is a maintenance obligation, a supply-chain surface and a potential licence question that transfers with the asset. The count says nothing about whether any given dependency was a good choice; it says how many such choices a buyer inherits.
apps/dashboard/package.json — 92 declared |
apps/web/package.json — 81 declared |
apps/status-page/package.json — 68 declared |
apps/server/package.json — 63 declared |
Go 1.25 is past end of life
adequateThe code is pinned to Go 1.25 (end of life 2026-08-11). None of these receives security fixes any more; the first stopped on 2026-08-11. Moving off an unsupported runtime is rarely a one-line change, so a buyer should ask whether the upgrade is planned and what it touches.
apps/ssh-server/Dockerfile — Go 1.25, end of life 2026-08-11 |
Security & Reliability Posture
adequate4 Dockerfiles run the application as root
adequateNo USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.
apps/checker/Dockerfile — runs as root |
apps/railway-proxy/Dockerfile — runs as root |
apps/screenshot-service/Dockerfile — runs as root |
apps/ssh-server/Dockerfile — runs as root |
The build runs third-party code it does not pin
adequate13 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.
.github/workflows/api-preview.yml:38 — action pinned by tag |
.github/workflows/api-preview.yml:77 — action pinned by tag |
2 outbound calls can wait forever
adequate2 HTTP calls use a client with no timeout (Python `requests` without `timeout=`, or Go's default client). When a dependency slows down, each one holds a worker until the connection gives up, and enough of them take the service down with the dependency.
apps/checker/handlers/handler.go:19 — outbound call without a timeout |
apps/ssh-server/main.go:73 — outbound call without a timeout |
18 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 6 high or critical in what ships
adequate18 of 1,873 locked dependencies match 25 published advisories in OSV, 9 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.
apps/checker/go.mod — google.golang.org/grpc v1.79.1: GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 (critical), fixed in 1.79.3 |
pnpm-lock.yaml — next 16.3.5: GHSA-vcvr-r3jv-pc5j (critical), fixed in 16.3.6 |
apps/private-location/go.mod — google.golang.org/grpc v1.77.0: GHSA-p77j-4mvh-x3m3 (critical), fixed in 1.79.3 |
9 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it
adequate9 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.
apps/status-page/src/app/(public)/layout.tsx:62 — HTML from a variable |
apps/status-page/src/app/(status-page)/[domain]/layout.tsx:51 — HTML from a variable |
apps/web/src/content/cmdk.tsx:551 — HTML from a variable |
Observability & Operations
strong9 of 12 deployed images carry no version, or `latest`
adequate9 images in the deployment configuration are named without a version or as `latest`. A redeploy can change the software without a commit, a rollback has nothing to roll back to, and nobody can say from the repository what is running.
charts/openstatus/values.yaml:97 — image without a version |
charts/openstatus/values.yaml:110 — image without a version |
charts/openstatus/values.yaml:123 — image without a version |
3 of 4 deployments run a single replica
adequate3 deployments set `replicas: 1`, and nothing (an autoscaler, a disruption budget) adds more. Every deploy and every node drain is downtime, and the availability the buyer inherits has a ceiling.
charts/openstatus/templates/libsql.yaml — replicas: 1 |
charts/openstatus/templates/probe.yaml — replicas: 1 |
charts/openstatus/templates/tinybird.yaml — replicas: 1 |
Fit with the Acquirer
not assessableNot rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.
Read more, or read your own
The full report on openstatushq/openstatus: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.
Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.