Borehole · Project · free tier
makeplane/plane
Free reading: not for reliance
c7a5afe · 7,196 commits · 5,032 files
Read 2026-10-04

makeplane/plane: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in makeplane/plane's code and history at c7a5afe: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenanceadequate
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed
  • LICENSE.txt: Relicensed: Apache-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2023-06-28)

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

adequate
01.6

apps/api/plane/api/views/issue.py is 2,603 lines, 41× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 63 lines. 16 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 2,603. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

01.25

1 base image floats: no version, or `latest`

adequate

1 of 9 `FROM` lines in product Dockerfiles name an image without a version, or with `latest`. Each build pulls whatever the registry serves that day, so the image that ships can change without a commit, and last month's build cannot be reproduced. Pin a version, or a digest.

Evidence
deployments/aio/community/Dockerfile:2 — base image without a version

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate
02.3

Tests cover a thin slice of the codebase

adequate

124 test files against 3,730 source files (3.3%). This does not measure whether the tests are good, only whether enough of them exist for the codebase to be changed safely by someone who did not write it — which is exactly the situation after an acquisition.

Evidence
124 test files / 3,730 source files

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.19

7% of bug fixes add or change a test

adequate

Of 1152 fixes in the last 24 months, 77 touched a test. A fix without the test that would have caught the bug can quietly come back, and the suite never learns from what went wrong.

Evidence
77 of 1152
04.62

Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

adequate

The newest release, v1.4.2, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v1.2.3. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too.

Evidence
tag v1.4.2

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.6

1 Dockerfile runs the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

Evidence
deployments/aio/community/Dockerfile — runs as root
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

8 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/build-branch.yml:168 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/build-branch.yml:196 — action pinned by tag
05.13

5 outbound calls can wait forever

adequate

5 HTTP calls use a client with no timeout (Python `requests` without `timeout=`, or Go's default client). When a dependency slows down, each one holds a worker until the connection gives up, and enough of them take the service down with the dependency.

Evidence
apps/api/plane/app/views/external/base.py:242 — outbound call without a timeout
apps/api/plane/authentication/provider/oauth/gitea.py:120 — outbound call without a timeout
apps/api/plane/authentication/provider/oauth/github.py:112 — outbound call without a timeout
05.17

24 of 128 migrations cannot be rolled back

adequate

24 schema migrations (19%) have no working way back: an empty `downgrade`, a `down` that does nothing, or a data migration with no reverse. A bad deploy that includes one is recovered from a backup, not reverted. Ask when a restore was last rehearsed.

05.26

7 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 9 high or critical in what ships

adequate

7 of 1,418 locked dependencies match 29 published advisories in OSV, 12 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.

Evidence
pnpm-lock.yaml — axios 1.18.1: GHSA-3pq3-5fj3-cg6v (high), fixed in 1.20.0
pnpm-lock.yaml — undici 7.29.0: GHSA-rfgv-xxqx-mfg5 (high), fixed in 7.29.1
pnpm-lock.yaml — brace-expansion 5.0.9: GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p (high), fixed in 5.0.10; a development dependency
05.48

9 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it

adequate

9 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.

05.60

Relicensed: Apache-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2023-06-28)

adequate

The root licence changed 1 time(s). The latest terms restrict what users, hosts or a buyer may do in ways the earlier ones did not. Code taken under the old terms stays under them, so both matter in diligence.

Evidence
LICENSE.txt — Apache-2.0 from 2022-11-19
LICENSE.txt — AGPL-3.0 from 2023-06-28
05.65

86 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 44 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-09-28. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. The record is incomplete: NVD: 108 records name plane with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2022-28199, CVE-2023-50913, CVE-2023-53864, …).

Evidence
2026-09-28: GHSA-64p2-pmc9-4fc7 (high), fixed in 1.4.0: Broken object level authorization allows cross-project read of page versions and related records
2026-09-28: GHSA-wcc5-qgfr-8g9c (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Workspace cycle and module endpoints missing project-membership filter expose private project metadata to any workspace member
2026-09-28: GHSA-w2vf-m9x9-mvmc (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Cross-project member roster IDOR in ProjectMemberListCreateAPIEndpoint (missing project scope on reads)
2026-09-28: GHSA-g49r-p85q-qq2w (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Cross-project page-version disclosure via project-agnostic page lookup in ProjectPagePermission (PageVersionEndpoint)
2026-09-28: GHSA-cjph-cgm5-8pw8 (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Cross-project asset disclosure: a workspace GUEST reads any project's file via WorkspaceFileAssetEndpoint (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-46558)

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised
06.35

Sends usage data to telemetry.plane.so by default

adequate

apps/api/plane/utils/otlp_endpoints.py sends to telemetry.plane.so, and apps/admin/components/instance/setup-form.tsx leaves reporting on as shipped. Every installation reports to the vendor unless its operator turns this off. For a buyer running it inside their own product, that is an outbound data flow to a third party: ask what is sent, how often, and whether the buyer's customers were told.

Evidence
apps/api/plane/utils/otlp_endpoints.py:8 — reports to telemetry.plane.so
apps/admin/components/instance/setup-form.tsx:59 — the reporting setting is on by default

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on makeplane/plane: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.