Read 2026-10-04
makeplane/plane: technical due diligence, read from its repository
What Borehole read in makeplane/plane's code and history at c7a5afe: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance | adequate |
| Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity | adequate |
| Product & Engineering Maturity | adequate |
| Security & Reliability Posture | adequate |
| Observability & Operations | adequate |
| Fit with the Acquirer | not assessable |
What the repository says
- Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed
LICENSE.txt: Relicensed: Apache-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2023-06-28)
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance
adequateapps/api/plane/api/views/issue.py is 2,603 lines, 41× this codebase's median file
adequateThe median source file here is 63 lines. 16 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 2,603. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.
apps/api/plane/api/views/issue.py:1 — 2,603 lines (41× median) |
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0001_initial.py:1 — 2,491 lines (39× median) |
apps/web/public/workbox-9f2f79cf.js:1 — 2,480 lines (39× median) |
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0077_draftissue_cycle_user_timezone_project_user_timezone_and_more.py:1 — 2,037 lines (32× median) |
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0046_label_sort_order_alter_analyticview_created_by_and_more.py:1 — 2,009 lines (31× median) |
1 base image floats: no version, or `latest`
adequate1 of 9 `FROM` lines in product Dockerfiles name an image without a version, or with `latest`. Each build pulls whatever the registry serves that day, so the image that ships can change without a commit, and last month's build cannot be reproduced. Pin a version, or a digest.
deployments/aio/community/Dockerfile:2 — base image without a version |
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity
adequateTests cover a thin slice of the codebase
adequate124 test files against 3,730 source files (3.3%). This does not measure whether the tests are good, only whether enough of them exist for the codebase to be changed safely by someone who did not write it — which is exactly the situation after an acquisition.
| 124 test files / 3,730 source files |
Product & Engineering Maturity
adequate7% of bug fixes add or change a test
adequateOf 1152 fixes in the last 24 months, 77 touched a test. A fix without the test that would have caught the bug can quietly come back, and the suite never learns from what went wrong.
| 77 of 1152 |
Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed
adequateThe newest release, v1.4.2, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v1.2.3. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too.
| tag v1.4.2 |
Security & Reliability Posture
adequate1 Dockerfile runs the application as root
adequateNo USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.
deployments/aio/community/Dockerfile — runs as root |
The build runs third-party code it does not pin
adequate8 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.
.github/workflows/build-branch.yml:168 — action pinned by tag |
.github/workflows/build-branch.yml:196 — action pinned by tag |
5 outbound calls can wait forever
adequate5 HTTP calls use a client with no timeout (Python `requests` without `timeout=`, or Go's default client). When a dependency slows down, each one holds a worker until the connection gives up, and enough of them take the service down with the dependency.
apps/api/plane/app/views/external/base.py:242 — outbound call without a timeout |
apps/api/plane/authentication/provider/oauth/gitea.py:120 — outbound call without a timeout |
apps/api/plane/authentication/provider/oauth/github.py:112 — outbound call without a timeout |
24 of 128 migrations cannot be rolled back
adequate24 schema migrations (19%) have no working way back: an empty `downgrade`, a `down` that does nothing, or a data migration with no reverse. A bad deploy that includes one is recovered from a backup, not reverted. Ask when a restore was last rehearsed.
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0035_auto_20230704_2225.py:29 — migration with no way back |
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0037_issue_archived_at_project_archive_in_and_more.py:86 — migration with no way back |
apps/api/plane/db/migrations/0038_auto_20230720_1505.py:31 — migration with no way back |
7 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 9 high or critical in what ships
adequate7 of 1,418 locked dependencies match 29 published advisories in OSV, 12 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.
pnpm-lock.yaml — axios 1.18.1: GHSA-3pq3-5fj3-cg6v (high), fixed in 1.20.0 |
pnpm-lock.yaml — undici 7.29.0: GHSA-rfgv-xxqx-mfg5 (high), fixed in 7.29.1 |
pnpm-lock.yaml — brace-expansion 5.0.9: GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p (high), fixed in 5.0.10; a development dependency |
9 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it
adequate9 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.
apps/web/hooks/use-parse-editor-content.ts:80 — HTML from a variable |
packages/editor/src/extensions/table/plugins/insert-handlers/utils.ts:38 — HTML from a variable |
packages/editor/src/extensions/table/plugins/insert-handlers/utils.ts:136 — HTML from a variable |
Relicensed: Apache-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2023-06-28)
adequateThe root licence changed 1 time(s). The latest terms restrict what users, hosts or a buyer may do in ways the earlier ones did not. Code taken under the old terms stays under them, so both matter in diligence.
LICENSE.txt — Apache-2.0 from 2022-11-19 |
LICENSE.txt — AGPL-3.0 from 2023-06-28 |
86 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 44 high or critical
adequateThe newest was published on 2026-09-28. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. The record is incomplete: NVD: 108 records name plane with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2022-28199, CVE-2023-50913, CVE-2023-53864, …).
| 2026-09-28: GHSA-64p2-pmc9-4fc7 (high), fixed in 1.4.0: Broken object level authorization allows cross-project read of page versions and related records |
| 2026-09-28: GHSA-wcc5-qgfr-8g9c (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Workspace cycle and module endpoints missing project-membership filter expose private project metadata to any workspace member |
| 2026-09-28: GHSA-w2vf-m9x9-mvmc (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Cross-project member roster IDOR in ProjectMemberListCreateAPIEndpoint (missing project scope on reads) |
| 2026-09-28: GHSA-g49r-p85q-qq2w (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Cross-project page-version disclosure via project-agnostic page lookup in ProjectPagePermission (PageVersionEndpoint) |
| 2026-09-28: GHSA-cjph-cgm5-8pw8 (moderate), fixed in 1.4.0: Cross-project asset disclosure: a workspace GUEST reads any project's file via WorkspaceFileAssetEndpoint (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-46558) |
Observability & Operations
adequateNo error reporter is wired in
adequateNothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.
| no error reporter initialised |
Sends usage data to telemetry.plane.so by default
adequateapps/api/plane/utils/otlp_endpoints.py sends to telemetry.plane.so, and apps/admin/components/instance/setup-form.tsx leaves reporting on as shipped. Every installation reports to the vendor unless its operator turns this off. For a buyer running it inside their own product, that is an outbound data flow to a third party: ask what is sent, how often, and whether the buyer's customers were told.
apps/api/plane/utils/otlp_endpoints.py:8 — reports to telemetry.plane.so |
apps/admin/components/instance/setup-form.tsx:59 — the reporting setting is on by default |
Fit with the Acquirer
not assessableNot rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.
Read more, or read your own
The full report on makeplane/plane: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.
Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.