Borehole · Project · free tier
kritt-ai/open-kritt
Free reading: not for reliance
7658d97 · 120 commits · 430 files
Read 2026-10-23

kritt-ai/open-kritt: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in kritt-ai/open-kritt's code and history at 7658d97: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenanceadequate
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

adequate
01.2

The repository begins with most of itself already written

adequate

The first commit carries 71,494 lines — 68% of every line ever added. Whatever happened before that commit happened somewhere this repository cannot show you, so the early history is not available as evidence of how the system was designed.

Evidence
2026-07-20T20:27:05+00:00; +71,494 across 340 files; subject: 'feat: first open-source commit'
01.6

executor-view/server.py is 4,854 lines, 45× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 106 lines. 12 files exceed 1,060 lines, the largest being 4,854. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
executor-view/server.py:1 — 4,854 lines (45× median)
frontend/src/pages/ScanDetail.jsx:1 — 2,963 lines (27× median)
engine/open_kritt_engine/harnesses.py:1 — 2,454 lines (23× median)
engine/open_kritt_engine/db.py:1 — 2,114 lines (19× median)
engine/open_kritt_engine/workspace.py:1 — 1,951 lines (18× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong

No finding.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.6

5 Dockerfiles run the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

Evidence
backend/Dockerfile — runs as root
database/Dockerfile — runs as root
engine/Dockerfile — runs as root
executor-view/Dockerfile — runs as root
05.20

1 SQL statement built from strings

adequate

1 places in product code build SQL by formatting or joining strings rather than passing parameters. In each, what the code shows going in is a table or column name, a constant, or something the line does not show, not a request's value. Ask whether any value reaches these strings, rather than a parameter.

Evidence
executor-view/server.py:661 — SQL built from a string
05.26

3 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 4 high or critical in what ships

adequate

3 of 142 locked dependencies match 5 published advisories in OSV, 4 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.

Evidence
backend/package-lock.json — proxy-addr 2.0.7: GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h (critical), fixed in 2.0.8
backend/package-lock.json — body-parser 2.3.0: GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828 (high), fixed in 2.4.0
backend/package-lock.json — brace-expansion 5.0.9: GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p (high), fixed in 5.0.10

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.1

No telemetry or error reporting is wired in anywhere

adequate

None of 344 readable files references an instrumentation, metrics or error-reporting library. If this system is in production, nobody learns that it broke from the system itself — they learn it from a customer. That is a reliability finding before it is an observability one.

Evidence
searched 344 tracked text files for 16 known instrumentation libraries; manifests for metrics, tracing and error-reporting families; locked dependencies for the packages that emit; 0 matched
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on kritt-ai/open-kritt: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.