Borehole · Project · free tier
horilla/horilla-hr
Free reading: not for reliance
c49300c · 6,581 commits · 9,021 files
Read 2026-11-03

horilla/horilla-hr: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in horilla/horilla-hr's code and history at c49300c: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

static/jquery/jqueryui.js is 19,063 lines, 211× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 90 lines. 86 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 19,063. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
static/jquery/jqueryui.js:1 — 19,063 lines (211× median)
static/jquery/ajax.js:1 — 10,910 lines (121× median)
base/views.py:1 — 8,868 lines (98× median)
leave/views.py:1 — 6,850 lines (76× median)
base/management/commands/create_branch_demo_fixtures.py:1 — 4,968 lines (55× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate
02.1

Little of the recent change carries a trace of review

adequate

In the last 24 months, 259 of 3,721 commits (7.0%) carry any trace of review: a merge, a pull-request reference, a Reviewed-by or Reviewed-on trailer, a Closes/Fixes reference, a maintainer's sign-off on someone else's change, or a change applied by someone other than its author. That is low but not absent. Review may happen in a workflow this history does not record; a buyer should ask how change is approved before it ships.

Evidence
259 of 3,721 commits in the last 24 months carry review evidence; 5.8% across all 6,581

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.19

10% of bug fixes add or change a test

adequate

Of 1291 fixes in the last 24 months, 126 touched a test. A fix without the test that would have caught the bug can quietly come back, and the suite never learns from what went wrong.

Evidence
126 of 1291

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.3

27 dependencies float, and no lockfile is committed

adequate

Dependency versions are declared as ranges and no lockfile is committed, so a build today does not necessarily produce what a build last month produced. That matters twice over in a transaction: the thing being bought cannot be reproduced exactly, and a compromised upstream release arrives without anyone choosing to take it.

Evidence
requirements.txt:28 — ~=5.2.17
requirements.txt:30 — >=2.9.13,<3
requirements.txt:66 — >=1.26,<3
requirements.txt:68 — >=2.1,<4
requirements.txt:76 — >=1.28.2,<2
05.5

10 credential-shaped strings added in the history sit in tests, examples, documentation or local development settings

adequate

Strings shaped like credentials appear only where fakes are usual: test fixtures, examples, documentation, placeholders and local stacks. They are almost always fakes. Ask someone to confirm that none of them works anywhere, because a real key in a development file is still a real key.

Evidence
5 cited: private key block, where fakes are usual
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

6 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/docker-ci.yml:26 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml:90 — action pinned by tag
05.20

1 SQL statement built from strings

adequate

1 places in product code build SQL by formatting or joining strings rather than passing parameters. 1 of them put a value into the string; in the rest, what the code shows going in is a table or column name, a constant, or something the line does not show. Ask whether any value reaches these strings, rather than a parameter.

05.22

1 deserialiser that can run code

adequate

1 places read data with a deserialiser that executes what it reads (pickle). That is safe on data the system wrote itself and remote code execution on anything else. Ask where each one's input comes from.

Evidence
horilla_widgets/generic_ajax.py:110 — code-executing deserialiser
05.9

1 vendored component with no licence

adequate

Third-party code is committed into this repository without any statement of the terms it arrived under. Unknown terms are harder to deal with than inconvenient ones: an awkward licence can be complied with, an absent one cannot. Each of these needs its origin established before the code changes hands.

Evidence
static/build/js/images/vendor/jquery-ui — 6 tracked files, no licence file
05.65

53 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 27 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-10-21. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries.

Evidence
2026-10-21: GHSA-7jjm-mcgq-9jj5 (moderate), fixed in 2.2.0: Horizontal IDOR in helpdesk ticket_individual_view: any authenticated employee can read any ticket
2026-10-21: GHSA-mr87-qrw6-rf3g (moderate), fixed in 2.2.0: Leave-tab IDOR exposes any employee's leave and medical data
2026-10-21: GHSA-2847-55wj-6r5m (moderate), fixed in 2.2.0: Authenticated employees can export all salary and attendance records regardless of their reporting scope
2026-10-21: GHSA-7jwm-2q24-6mv3 (moderate), fixed in 2.2.0: Project and task details lack object-level authorization
2026-10-21: GHSA-925v-gjrp-mwcp (moderate), fixed in 2.2.0: External Control of File Name or Path in horilla/horilla-hr

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.2

No structured logging library is in use

adequate

Nothing references a structured logging library. Logs that are written to be read by a person are not searchable by a machine, which means incident response here is proportional to how well someone remembers the codebase rather than to what the tooling can find.

Evidence
searched 3,922 files for 10 structured logging libraries; 0 matched

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on horilla/horilla-hr: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.