Borehole · Project · free tier
gofiber/fiber
Free reading: not for reliance
ae1ef46 · 7,203 commits · 482 files
Read 2026-10-04

gofiber/fiber: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in gofiber/fiber's code and history at ae1ef46: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • LICENSE: Relicensed: GPL-3.0 → MIT (2020-01-06) → Apache-2.0 (2020-01-13) → MIT (2020-01-16)

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong

No finding.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong

No finding.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.1

3 credential-shaped strings in the tree sit in tests, examples, documentation or local development settings

adequate

Strings shaped like credentials appear only where fakes are usual: test fixtures, examples, documentation, placeholders and local stacks. They are almost always fakes. Ask someone to confirm that none of them works anywhere, because a real key in a development file is still a real key.

Evidence
3 cited: JWT, where fakes are usual
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

14 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/after-release.yml:42 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/auto-labeler.yml:17 — action pinned by tag
05.13

2 outbound calls can wait forever

adequate

2 HTTP calls use a client with no timeout (Python `requests` without `timeout=`, or Go's default client). When a dependency slows down, each one holds a worker until the connection gives up, and enough of them take the service down with the dependency.

Evidence
client/client.go:832 — outbound call without a timeout
client/client.go:956 — outbound call without a timeout
05.60

Relicensed: GPL-3.0 → MIT (2020-01-06) → Apache-2.0 (2020-01-13) → MIT (2020-01-16)

adequate

The root licence changed 3 time(s). Code taken under earlier terms stays under them; check which terms any fork or customer relied on.

Evidence
LICENSE — GPL-3.0 from 2020-01-06
LICENSE — MIT from 2020-01-06
LICENSE — Apache-2.0 from 2020-01-13
LICENSE — MIT from 2020-01-16
05.65

12 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 5 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-08-12. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. None of them affects the surveyed version. The record is incomplete: NVD: 2 records name fiber with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2024-6355, CVE-2025-1081).

Evidence
2026-08-12: GHSA-c5qf-v26h-rp5r (moderate), fixed in >= v2.52.15: idempotency middleware: default MemoryLock leaks one mutex per unique key (memory-exhaustion DoS)
2026-07-02: GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8 (moderate), fixed in 3.3.0: GoFiber Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer
2026-07-02: GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876 (moderate), fixed in 2.52.14: GoFiber Vulnerable to X-Real-IP Spoofing via Header.Add() in BalancerForward
2026-07-02: GO-2026-5912 (moderate), fixed in 3.4.0: GoFiber never set HSTS header in helmet middleware due to incorrect protocol check in github.com/gofiber/fiber
2026-04-25: GHSA-35hp-hqmv-8qg8 (moderate), fixed in 3.2.0: Fiber's cache middleware default key generator ignores query string, causing response mix-up across distinct query parameters

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.1

No telemetry or error reporting is wired in anywhere

adequate

None of 461 readable files references an instrumentation, metrics or error-reporting library. If this system is in production, nobody learns that it broke from the system itself — they learn it from a customer. That is a reliability finding before it is an observability one.

Evidence
searched 461 tracked text files for 16 known instrumentation libraries; manifests for metrics, tracing and error-reporting families; locked dependencies for the packages that emit; 0 matched
06.2

No structured logging library is in use

adequate

Nothing references a structured logging library. Logs that are written to be read by a person are not searchable by a machine, which means incident response here is proportional to how well someone remembers the codebase rather than to what the tooling can find.

Evidence
searched 461 files for 10 structured logging libraries; 0 matched
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on gofiber/fiber: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.