Borehole · Project · free tier
getsentry/sentry
Free reading: not for reliance
051c2f1 · 50,000 commits · 21,967 files
Read 2026-10-22

getsentry/sentry: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in getsentry/sentry's code and history at 051c2f1: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • LICENSE.md:1: The licence is FSL-1.1-ALv2: source available, not open source
  • LICENSE: Relicensed: BUSL-1.1 → FSL-1.0-ALv2 (2023-11-17) → FSL-1.1-ALv2 (2024-02-27)

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

src/sentry/api/helpers/android_models.py is 24,570 lines, 307× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 80 lines. 140 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 24,570. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
src/sentry/api/helpers/android_models.py:1 — 24,570 lines (307× median)
src/sentry/migrations/0001_squashed_1118_add_group_derived_data.py:1 — 10,453 lines (130× median)
src/sentry/options/defaults.py:1 — 4,707 lines (58× median)
src/sentry/api/urls.py:1 — 3,971 lines (49× median)
src/sentry/conf/server.py:1 — 3,690 lines (46× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong
02.16

Tests are retried until they pass

adequate

The suite is configured to retry failing tests (.github/workflows/scripts/test_pytest_selected.py). A retry turns a flaky test green without saying why it failed, so a green build means the tests passed eventually. Ask how many retries a typical run needs, and which tests need them.

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.3

121 direct dependencies in a single manifest

adequate

static/app/package.json declares 121 direct dependencies. Each one is a maintenance obligation, a supply-chain surface and a potential licence question that transfers with the asset. The count says nothing about whether any given dependency was a good choice; it says how many such choices a buyer inherits.

Evidence
static/app/package.json — 121 declared
pyproject.toml — 113 declared
package.json — 38 declared
static/gsApp/package.json — 26 declared

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.13

11 outbound calls can wait forever

adequate

11 HTTP calls use a client with no timeout (Python `requests` without `timeout=`, or Go's default client). When a dependency slows down, each one holds a worker until the connection gives up, and enough of them take the service down with the dependency.

Evidence
bin/extension_language_map.py:8 — outbound call without a timeout
src/sentry/integrations/utils/atlassian_connect.py:146 — outbound call without a timeout
src/sentry/middleware/integrations/tasks.py:97 — outbound call without a timeout
05.20

2 SQL statements built from strings

adequate

2 places in product code build SQL by formatting or joining strings rather than passing parameters. 1 of them put a value into the string; in the rest, what the code shows going in is a table or column name, a constant, or something the line does not show. Ask whether any value reaches these strings, rather than a parameter.

Evidence
src/sentry/api/paginator.py:46 — SQL built from a string
src/sentry/backup/services/import_export/impl.py:334 — SQL built from a string
05.22

8 deserialisers that can run code

adequate

8 places read data with a deserialiser that executes what it reads (pickle). That is safe on data the system wrote itself and remote code execution on anything else. Ask where each one's input comes from.

Evidence
src/sentry/buffer/redis.py:555 — code-executing deserialiser
src/sentry/buffer/redis.py:568 — code-executing deserialiser
src/sentry/digests/codecs.py:19 — code-executing deserialiser
05.26

7 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 6 high or critical in what ships

adequate

7 of 1,893 locked dependencies match 13 published advisories in OSV, 8 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.

Evidence
pnpm-lock.yaml — dompurify 3.4.16: GHSA-cg2g-xh64-v4q7 (critical), fixed in 3.4.17
pnpm-lock.yaml — handlebars 4.7.9: GHSA-8r5x-fm3f-whwj (critical), fixed in 4.7.10; a development dependency
uv.lock — djangorestframework 3.17.2: GHSA-33wh-fxxf-88vv (high), fixed in 3.18.2
05.48

13 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it

adequate

13 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.

05.9

3 vendored components with no licence

adequate

Third-party code is committed into this repository without any statement of the terms it arrived under. Unknown terms are harder to deal with than inconvenient ones: an awkward licence can be complied with, an absent one cannot. Each of these needs its origin established before the code changes hands.

Evidence
src/sentry/static/sentry/vendor/fonts — 3 tracked files, no licence file
src/sentry/static/sentry/vendor/jquery.2.2.4.min.js — 1 tracked files, no licence file
src/sentry/static/sentry/vendor/select2.css — 1 tracked files, no licence file
05.66

The licence is FSL-1.1-ALv2: source available, not open source

adequate

LICENSE.md grants FSL-1.1-ALv2: source available, not open source; a competing commercial product or service is not allowed; each version becomes Apache-2.0 two years after its release. The reading comes from the licence's own title and clauses. Whether the terms fit the buyer's intended use, and whether any paid licence transfers with the code, is a question for counsel and the licensor.

Evidence
LICENSE.md:1 — 105 lines, FSL-1.1-ALv2
05.60

Relicensed: BUSL-1.1 → FSL-1.0-ALv2 (2023-11-17) → FSL-1.1-ALv2 (2024-02-27)

adequate

The root licence changed 2 time(s). Code taken under earlier terms stays under them; check which terms any fork or customer relied on.

Evidence
LICENSE — BUSL-1.1 from 2020-12-15
LICENSE — FSL-1.0-ALv2 from 2023-11-17
LICENSE.md — FSL-1.1-ALv2 from 2024-02-27
05.65

16 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 10 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-10-21. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. The record is incomplete: NVD: 36 records name sentry with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2004-0193, CVE-2012-2604, CVE-2012-2605, …).

Evidence
2026-10-21: CVE-2026-114139 (critical): Sentry-Javascript is an official Sentry SDKs for JavaScript. From 9.36.0 until 9.47.2, 10.75.2, and 11.0.0-rc.1, the webpack integration for @sentry/nextjs skip
2026-10-19: GHSA-88p9-44cg-fr2q (high), fixed in 26.10.0: Improper email matching in SAML SSO process allows account takeover
2026-08-17: GHSA-rrcx-889m-5jj5 (critical), fixed in 26.8.0: Improper authentication on SAML SSO allows unauthorized organization member addition or identity linking
2026-07-24: GHSA-w699-8wff-fqxw (critical), fixed in 26.7.2: Improper authentication on SAML SSO process allows user identity linking
2026-07-16: GHSA-xm86-7c47-gjm4 (critical), fixed in 26.7.0: Unsafe pickle deserialization in Relocation Feature

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.35

Sends usage data to stats.stackexchange.com by default

adequate

src/sentry/search/events/datasets/discover.py sends to stats.stackexchange.com, and src/sentry/api/serializers/models/project.py leaves reporting on as shipped. Every installation reports to the vendor unless its operator turns this off. For a buyer running it inside their own product, that is an outbound data flow to a third party: ask what is sent, how often, and whether the buyer's customers were told.

Evidence
src/sentry/search/events/datasets/discover.py:245 — reports to stats.stackexchange.com
src/sentry/api/serializers/models/project.py:1135 — the reporting setting is on by default

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on getsentry/sentry: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.