Borehole · Project · free tier
fatedier/frp
Free reading: not for reliance
d20a232 · 1,524 commits · 525 files
Read 2026-10-04

fatedier/frp: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in fatedier/frp's code and history at d20a232: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong

No finding.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong
04.62

Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

adequate

The newest release, v0.71.0, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v0.62.1. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too.

Evidence
tag v0.71.0

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.2

None of the standard security guard rails are configured

adequate

There is no disclosure policy, no automated dependency updates, no named code owners and no pre-commit configuration. None of these is load-bearing on its own. Their collective absence says that security posture here is whatever the current team happens to remember to do, which is not a posture that survives the team changing.

Evidence
checked 5 kinds of guard rail across 525 tracked files; 0 present
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

6 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/build-and-push-image.yml:27 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/build-and-push-image.yml:30 — action pinned by tag
05.26

1 locked dependency has published vulnerabilities

adequate

1 of 173 locked dependencies match 3 published advisories in OSV. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.

Evidence
go.mod — golang.org/x/crypto v0.54.0: GO-2026-6303 (unrated), fixed in 0.55.0
05.65

2 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 1 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-07-23. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 1 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 0.62.1. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version. GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp (high) is fixed in the surveyed commit; which release carries it cannot be told from this history, which does not place the release users run. Answer lives in: the version you run. The record is incomplete: NVD: 1 record names frp with nothing tying it to this repository (CVE-2019-25053).

Evidence
2026-07-23: GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp (high), fixed in 0.70.1: frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow
2026-04-13: GHSA-pq96-pwvg-vrr9 (moderate), fixed in 0.68.1: frp has an authentication bypass in HTTP vhost routing when routeByHTTPUser is used for access control

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.2

No structured logging library is in use

adequate

Nothing references a structured logging library. Logs that are written to be read by a person are not searchable by a machine, which means incident response here is proportional to how well someone remembers the codebase rather than to what the tooling can find.

Evidence
searched 497 files for 10 structured logging libraries; 0 matched
06.8

One request cannot be followed through the logs

adequate

Nothing in the service carries a request or correlation id, and there is no tracing. When a customer reports a failure, the log lines that belong to their request cannot be picked out from everyone else's.

Evidence
no request id, correlation id or tracing found
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on fatedier/frp: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.