Borehole · Project · free tier
element-hq/element-x-ios
Free reading: not for reliance
9205e11 · 4,806 commits · 4,302 files
Read 2026-10-04

element-hq/element-x-ios: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in element-hq/element-x-ios's code and history at 9205e11: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Posturestrong
Observability & Operationsnot assessable
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • LICENSE: Relicensed: Apache-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2024-09-06)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md:24: states a policy on AI-generated contributions
  • .gitmodules:1: 1 submodule(s) this survey does not read: Enterprise

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

ElementX/Sources/Generated/Strings.swift is 4,246 lines, 57× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 74 lines. 5 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 4,246. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong

No finding.

Security & Reliability Posture

strong
05.9

1 vendored component with no licence

adequate

Third-party code is committed into this repository without any statement of the terms it arrived under. Unknown terms are harder to deal with than inconvenient ones: an awkward licence can be complied with, an absent one cannot. Each of these needs its origin established before the code changes hands.

Evidence
Components/Secrets/vendor/package-2 — 2 tracked files, no licence file
05.60

Relicensed: Apache-2.0 → AGPL-3.0 (2024-09-06)

adequate

The root licence changed 1 time(s). The latest terms restrict what users, hosts or a buyer may do in ways the earlier ones did not. Code taken under the old terms stays under them, so both matter in diligence.

Evidence
LICENSE — Apache-2.0 from 2022-04-26
LICENSE — AGPL-3.0 from 2024-09-06
05.65

3 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 3 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-08-07. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 1 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 26.9.2. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version.

Evidence
2026-08-07: CVE-2026-48007 (high): Element Call is a native Matrix video conferencing application. Versions 0.5.17 through 0.19.3 report analytics data to a PostHog server, when configured to by
2026-06-15: GHSA-54w7-rw44-49m7 (high), fixed in 26.05.0: io.element.call deeplink allows attacker-controlled HTTPS origin and may grant mic/camera to that origin
2025-04-03: GHSA-69qf-p24v-rf8j (high), fixed in 25.03.8: The entity in control of the well-known file can break the confidentiality of embedded Element Call

Observability & Operations

not assessable

Not rated: only 4 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on element-hq/element-x-ios: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.