Borehole · Project · free tier
duendesoftware/products
Free reading: not for reliance
222118c · 8,241 commits · 5,719 files
Read 2026-10-28

duendesoftware/products: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in duendesoftware/products's code and history at 222118c: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsstrong
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

identity-server/src/IdentityServer/Internal/Saml/Sp/Metadata/MetadataSerializer.cs is 5,202 lines, 100× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 52 lines. 11 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 5,202. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate
02.24

5% of recent commits change more than 2,000 lines

adequate

57 of 1140 commits in the last 24 months changed over 2,000 lines of code, not counting reformatting, renames, vendored or generated code. A change that size is rarely reviewed line by line. Ask how they were reviewed, and what made them that large.

Evidence
57 commits over 2,000 lines

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong

No finding.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.2

None of the standard security guard rails are configured

adequate

There is no disclosure policy, no automated dependency updates, no named code owners and no pre-commit configuration. None of these is load-bearing on its own. Their collective absence says that security posture here is whatever the current team happens to remember to do, which is not a posture that survives the team changing.

Evidence
checked 5 kinds of guard rail across 5,719 tracked files; 0 present
05.26

6 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 17 high or critical in what ships

adequate

6 of 271 locked dependencies match 18 published advisories in OSV, 17 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.

Evidence
bff/templates/src/BffBlazorAutoRenderMode/BffBlazorAutoRenderMode/BffBlazorAutoRenderMode.csproj — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.Server 10.0.0: GHSA-g27p-qf6j-c96c (high), fixed in 10.0.13
Directory.Packages.props — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.Server 10.0.4: GHSA-g27p-qf6j-c96c (high), fixed in 10.0.13
bff/Directory.Packages.props — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.Server 10.0.7: GHSA-g27p-qf6j-c96c (high), fixed in 10.0.13
05.10

Licence text does not match a standard licence

adequate

LICENSE exists but its text does not match any standard licence. A bespoke or hand-edited licence is not wrong, but it cannot be cleared by recognising its name: counsel has to read it, and until they do neither side knows precisely what rights transfer with the code.

Evidence
LICENSE:1 — 5 lines, unrecognised
05.65

4 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 1 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-10-07. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 4 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version. The record is incomplete: NVD: its keyword search for 'products' is too broad to read whole (9,125 records); NVD: 298 records name products with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2010-2371, CVE-2010-2372, CVE-2010-2414, …).

Evidence
2026-10-07: GHSA-vvg7-p7jw-8qr3 (moderate), fixed in 2.2.1: BFF session cookie forwarded to remote APIs proxied through YARP
2026-10-07: GHSA-4j63-5v5f-xcc4 (moderate), fixed in 4.0.4: Dynamic-frontend remote API proxy (WithRemoteApis) skips the BFF anti-forgery header
2026-09-28: GHSA-mxv6-xwqj-ww2p (high), fixed in 7.0.10: Insufficient validation of pushed authorization requests in IdentityServer
2024-10-28: GHSA-v9xq-2mvm-x8xc (low), fixed in 7.0.8: Insufficient validation of DPoP cnf claim in Local APIs

Observability & Operations

strong
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on duendesoftware/products: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.