Borehole · Project · free tier
dagster-io/dagster
Free reading: not for reliance
d21ac06 · 28,135 commits · 14,564 files
Read 2026-10-22

dagster-io/dagster: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in dagster-io/dagster's code and history at d21ac06: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong

No finding.

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.3

136 direct dependencies in a single manifest

adequate

ty/master/pyproject.toml declares 136 direct dependencies. Each one is a maintenance obligation, a supply-chain surface and a potential licence question that transfers with the asset. The count says nothing about whether any given dependency was a good choice; it says how many such choices a buyer inherits.

Evidence
ty/master/pyproject.toml — 136 declared
js_modules/ui-core/package.json — 49 declared
ty/airflow/pyproject.toml — 42 declared
python_modules/dagster/pyproject.toml — 32 declared
04.38

40 files still carry code deprecated more than two years ago

adequate

40 files were marked deprecated over two years ago and still are, the oldest since Mar 2023. A deprecation is a promise to remove. Ask what still depends on these, and whether removing them is scheduled.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.6

8 Dockerfiles run the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

2 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day; 1 step pipes a download straight into a shell. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/build-docs.yml:95 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/check-docs.yml:18 — action pinned by tag
.buildkite/dagster-buildkite/dagster_buildkite/steps/dagster.py:138 — download piped into a shell
05.26

73 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 40 high or critical in what ships

adequate

73 of 3,114 locked dependencies match 149 published advisories in OSV, 88 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.

Evidence
ty/airflow/uv.lock — apache-airflow 2.11.2: GHSA-2943-9672-r45w (critical), fixed in 3.3.0
python_modules/dagster-cloud/uv.lock — certifi 2025.1.31: GHSA-6q48-6c7w-9gw2 (critical), fixed in 2026.10.19
helm/dagster/schema/uv.lock — certifi 2026.4.22: GHSA-6q48-6c7w-9gw2 (critical), fixed in 2026.10.19
05.65

3 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 1 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-04-17. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 1 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 14.2.0. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version.

Evidence
2026-04-17: GHSA-mjw2-v2hm-wj34 (high), fixed in 0.29.1: Dagster Vulnerable to SQL Injection via Dynamic Partition Keys in Database I/O Manager Integrations
2025-07-22: GHSA-h7x8-jv97-fvvm (moderate), fixed in 1.10.16: Dagster Local File Inclusion vulnerability
2025-07-07: GHSA-q93c-p2mw-p23f (moderate), fixed in 1.5.11: Dagster vulnerable to Path Traversal attack through its /logs endpoint

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.8

One request cannot be followed through the logs

adequate

Nothing in the service carries a request or correlation id, and there is no tracing. When a customer reports a failure, the log lines that belong to their request cannot be picked out from everyone else's.

Evidence
no request id, correlation id or tracing found
06.9

An error reporter is installed but never initialised

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on dagster-io/dagster: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.