Borehole · Project · free tier
coollabsio/coolify
Free reading: not for reliance
8bbab72 · 17,538 commits · 4,354 files
Read 2026-10-04

coollabsio/coolify: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in coollabsio/coolify's code and history at 8bbab72: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsstrong
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • CONTRIBUTING.md:85: The project does not take pull requests
  • LICENSE: Relicensed: AGPL-3.0 → Apache-2.0 (2022-08-11)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md:5: states a policy on AI-generated contributions

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

app/Http/Controllers/Api/ApplicationsController.php is 6,324 lines, 82× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 77 lines. 26 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 6,324. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
app/Http/Controllers/Api/ApplicationsController.php:1 — 6,324 lines (82× median)
app/Jobs/ApplicationDeploymentJob.php:1 — 5,856 lines (76× median)
bootstrap/helpers/shared.php:1 — 5,588 lines (72× median)
app/Http/Controllers/Api/DatabasesController.php:1 — 5,156 lines (66× median)
app/Http/Controllers/Api/ServicesController.php:1 — 3,413 lines (44× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong

No finding.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.1

14 credential-shaped strings in the tree sit in tests, examples, documentation or local development settings

adequate

Strings shaped like credentials appear only where fakes are usual: test fixtures, examples, documentation, placeholders and local stacks. They are almost always fakes. Ask someone to confirm that none of them works anywhere, because a real key in a development file is still a real key. 3 other matchs set aside: expired tokens, licence tokens a vendor verifies with a public key, or placeholder text where a key would go. None grants access to anything.

Evidence
5 cited: GitHub token, where fakes are usual
05.6

2 Dockerfiles run the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

Evidence
docker/coolify-helper/Dockerfile — runs as root
docker/testing-host/Dockerfile — runs as root
05.25

3 environment files are committed

adequate

.env.dusk.ci, .env.production, other/nightly/.env.production are tracked in git. Environment files are where credentials usually live, and committing one usually means nobody decided how secrets reach the running application. Whatever is in it is in the history for good. Check 05.1 says whether it holds anything credential-shaped.

Evidence
.env.dusk.ci — committed environment file
.env.production — committed environment file
other/nightly/.env.production — committed environment file
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

7 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day; 5 steps pipe a download straight into a shell. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/claude.yml:34 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/coolify-helper-next.yml:37 — action pinned by tag
docker/coolify-helper/Dockerfile:54 — download piped into a shell
05.45

14 workload settings give a container the host

adequate

14 places in the deployment configuration run a container privileged or in the host's network, process or IPC namespace. A compromise of that container is a compromise of the machine, and most acquirers' security reviews block it. Node agents (network, storage, monitoring) are excluded.

Evidence
templates/compose/beszel-agent.yaml:10 — privileged or host namespace
templates/compose/beszel.yaml:28 — privileged or host namespace
templates/compose/cloudflare-ddns.yaml:10 — privileged or host namespace
05.60

Relicensed: AGPL-3.0 → Apache-2.0 (2022-08-11)

adequate

The root licence changed 1 time(s). Code taken under earlier terms stays under them; check which terms any fork or customer relied on.

Evidence
LICENSE — AGPL-3.0 from 2021-03-24
LICENSE — Apache-2.0 from 2022-08-11
05.65

77 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 52 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-09-27. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries. Whether 32 of them are fixed in the code you ship could not be told from this history: its version is only known to be at least 4.3.23. Answer lives in: the release you run, set against each fixed version. The record is incomplete: NVD: 2 records name coolify with nothing tying them to this repository (CVE-2026-12815, CVE-2026-15507).

Evidence
2026-09-27: CVE-2026-100744 (moderate): A flaw has been found in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file app/Http/Middleware/CanUpdateResource.php of th
2026-09-27: CVE-2026-100746 (moderate): A vulnerability was found in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.0. This affects the function Github::redirect of the file /webhooks/source/github/redirect of the comp
2026-09-05: CVE-2026-86117 (critical): Coolify through 4.3.17 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the OAuth callback handler that signs users into existing accounts based solely on ema
2026-09-02: CVE-2026-84694 (high): Coolify before 4.2.0 fails to properly escape environment variable key names in Docker commands executed over SSH on managed servers. Authenticated attackers ca
2026-07-02: GHSA-chg4-63hm-xv9x (high), fixed in 4.0.0-beta.474: Authenticated RCE via SHELL_SAFE_COMMAND_PATTERN regression → host root

Observability & Operations

strong
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised
06.18

3 of 11 deployed images carry no version, or `latest`

adequate

3 images in the deployment configuration are named without a version or as `latest`. A redeploy can change the software without a commit, a rollback has nothing to roll back to, and nobody can say from the repository what is running.

Evidence
docker-compose-maxio.dev.yml:103 — image without a version
other/nightly/docker-compose.windows.yml:4 — image without a version
other/nightly/docker-compose.windows.yml:11 — image without a version

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on coollabsio/coolify: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.