Borehole · Project · free tier
complianceascode/content
Free reading: not for reliance
584615c · 44,553 commits · 13,847 files
Read 2026-11-03

complianceascode/content: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in complianceascode/content's code and history at 584615c: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturitystrong
Security & Reliability Posturestrong
Observability & Operationsadequate
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed
  • LICENSE: Relicensed: Unlicense → BSD-3-Clause (2018-01-19)

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

ssg/build_yaml.py is 3,642 lines, 364× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 10 lines. 6 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 3,642. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
ssg/build_yaml.py:1 — 3,642 lines (364× median)
ssg/ext/boolean/boolean.py:1 — 1,496 lines (149× median)
cmake/SSGCommon.cmake:1 — 1,464 lines (146× median)
utils/ansible_roles_to_collection.py:1 — 1,130 lines (113× median)
ssg/controls.py:1 — 1,124 lines (112× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

strong
04.62

Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

adequate

The newest release, v0.1.82, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is v0.1.61. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too.

Evidence
tag v0.1.82

Security & Reliability Posture

strong
05.3

24 dependencies float, and no lockfile is committed

adequate

Dependency versions are declared as ranges and no lockfile is committed, so a build today does not necessarily produce what a build last month produced. That matters twice over in a transaction: the thing being bought cannot be reproduced exactly, and a compromised upstream release arrives without anyone choosing to take it.

Evidence
docs/requirements.txt:1 — any version
docs/requirements.txt:2 — any version
docs/requirements.txt:3 — any version
docs/requirements.txt:4 — any version
docs/requirements.txt:5 — any version
05.5

3 credential-shaped strings exist in the history

adequate

Matches for private key block were committed at some point across 20,000 commits examined (the scan stopped at its limit, so older history was not read). The files that held them are no longer in the working tree — but removal from a file is not removal from the history, and the history is what transfers with the asset. What matters is whether each was rotated after it was committed. The code cannot tell whether any of them is live, and that decides whether this matters: none sits in production configuration, and none is in a format its provider keeps for live keys. Is any of these live? Show that each was rotated after it was committed, and when.

Evidence
3 cited: private key block pattern added here
05.21

7 shell commands built from strings

adequate

7 places run a command through a shell (`shell=True`, `os.system`, `exec` with a template) rather than passing arguments. Where any part comes from outside, it is command injection. Ask where each one's input comes from.

Evidence
utils/ansible_playbook_to_role.py:95 — command run through a shell
utils/ansible_playbook_to_role.py:100 — command run through a shell
utils/ansible_playbook_to_role.py:101 — command run through a shell
05.22

3 deserialisers that can run code

adequate

3 places read data with a deserialiser that executes what it reads (`yaml.load` without a safe loader). That is safe on data the system wrote itself and remote code execution on anything else. Ask where each one's input comes from.

Evidence
ssg/yaml.py:204 — code-executing deserialiser
ssg/yaml.py:318 — code-executing deserialiser
ssg/yaml.py:363 — code-executing deserialiser
05.60

Relicensed: Unlicense → BSD-3-Clause (2018-01-19)

adequate

The root licence changed 1 time(s). Code taken under earlier terms stays under them; check which terms any fork or customer relied on.

Evidence
LICENSE — Unlicense from 2015-07-03
LICENSE — BSD-3-Clause from 2018-01-19

Observability & Operations

adequate
06.8

One request cannot be followed through the logs

adequate

Nothing in the service carries a request or correlation id, and there is no tracing. When a customer reports a failure, the log lines that belong to their request cannot be picked out from everyone else's.

Evidence
no request id, correlation id or tracing found
06.9

No error reporter is wired in

adequate

Nothing in the service initialises an error reporter (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag, Honeybadger or an APM agent). An exception in production reaches a person only if someone is reading the logs, which usually means a customer reports it first.

Evidence
no error reporter initialised

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on complianceascode/content: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.