Borehole · Project · free tier
apitable/apitable
Free reading: not for reliance
c9255a7 · 3,923 commits · 8,965 files
Read 2026-10-23

apitable/apitable: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in apitable/apitable's code and history at c9255a7: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenanceadequate
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsstrong
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

adequate
01.6

packages/api-client/types/ObservableAPI.ts is 8,676 lines, 160× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 54 lines. 36 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 8,676. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
packages/api-client/types/ObservableAPI.ts:1 — 8,676 lines (160× median)
packages/api-client/types/ObjectParamAPI.ts:1 — 7,739 lines (143× median)
packages/core/src/config/stringkeys.interface.ts:1 — 6,081 lines (112× median)
packages/api-client/types/PromiseAPI.ts:1 — 5,777 lines (106× median)
packages/datasheet/public/custom/custom_config.js:1 — 3,692 lines (68× median)
01.25

5 base images float: no version, or `latest`

adequate

5 of 11 `FROM` lines in product Dockerfiles name an image without a version, or with `latest`. Each build pulls whatever the registry serves that day, so the image that ships can change without a commit, and last month's build cannot be reproduced. Pin a version, or a digest.

Evidence
packaging/all-in-one/all-in-one/Dockerfile:8 — base image without a version
packaging/all-in-one/all-in-one/Dockerfile:9 — base image without a version
packaging/all-in-one/all-in-one/Dockerfile:10 — base image without a version

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate
02.3

Tests cover a thin slice of the codebase

adequate

478 test files against 6,761 source files (7.1%). This does not measure whether the tests are good, only whether enough of them exist for the codebase to be changed safely by someone who did not write it — which is exactly the situation after an acquisition.

Evidence
478 test files / 6,761 source files

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.3

194 direct dependencies in a single manifest

adequate

packages/datasheet/package.json declares 194 direct dependencies. Each one is a maintenance obligation, a supply-chain surface and a potential licence question that transfers with the asset. The count says nothing about whether any given dependency was a good choice; it says how many such choices a buyer inherits.

04.17

Node.js 16 is past end of life

adequate

The code is pinned to Node.js 16 (end of life 2023-09-11). None of these receives security fixes any more; the first stopped on 2023-09-11. Moving off an unsupported runtime is rarely a one-line change, so a buyer should ask whether the upgrade is planned and what it touches.

Evidence
.nvmrc — Node.js 16, end of life 2023-09-11
04.19

0% of bug fixes add or change a test

adequate

Of 54 fixes in the last 24 months, 0 touched a test. A fix without the test that would have caught the bug can quietly come back, and the suite never learns from what went wrong.

Evidence
0 of 54
04.14

3 jobs are each done by more than one library

adequate

Within a single package: HTTP clients: axios, node-fetch; dates: date-fns, dayjs, luxon, moment; state management: jotai, redux. Each duplicate is bundle size, two ways of doing the same thing in one codebase, and two upgrade paths to maintain. It is usually the residue of a migration that stopped halfway.

Evidence
package.json — several libraries per job
packages/ai-components/package.json — several libraries per job
04.38

41 files still carry code deprecated more than two years ago

adequate

41 files were marked deprecated over two years ago and still are, the oldest since Dec 2022. A deprecation is a promise to remove. Ask what still depends on these, and whether removing them is scheduled.

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.6

4 Dockerfiles run the application as root

adequate

No USER instruction switches away from root, so the process runs with full privileges inside the container. It is a one-line fix and an ordinary expectation, which is why its absence is worth asking about: it usually says more about whether anyone has reviewed the deployment than about this container specifically.

05.25

4 environment files are committed

adequate

.env, .env.devenv, packages/components/.env and more are tracked in git. Environment files are where credentials usually live, and committing one usually means nobody decided how secrets reach the running application. Whatever is in it is in the history for good. Check 05.1 says whether it holds anything credential-shaped.

Evidence
.env — committed environment file
.env.devenv — committed environment file
packages/components/.env — committed environment file
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

5 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/ai_code_reviewer.yml:21 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/build.yaml:30 — action pinned by tag
05.20

6 SQL statements built from strings

adequate

6 places in product code build SQL by formatting or joining strings rather than passing parameters. In each, what the code shows going in is a table or column name, a constant, or something the line does not show, not a request's value. Ask whether any value reaches these strings, rather than a parameter.

05.26

123 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 75 high or critical in what ships

adequate

123 of 4,059 locked dependencies match 241 published advisories in OSV, 120 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version. This lockfile pins development tools alongside what ships and does not say which is which, so some of these may never reach a user.

Evidence
pnpm-lock.yaml — @babel/traverse 7.22.20: GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92 (critical), fixed in 7.23.2
pnpm-lock.yaml — handlebars 4.7.8: GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q (critical), fixed in 4.7.9
pnpm-lock.yaml — piscina 3.2.0: GHSA-67c8-pqhq-4rmx (critical), fixed in 5.3.2
05.48

27 places insert HTML from a variable without sanitising it

adequate

27 places set HTML from a value that is neither a literal nor passed through a sanitiser. Where the value can come from a user, that is stored cross-site scripting, and it is the first thing a buyer's security review looks for in a frontend.

05.65

5 advisories against this project in the last 24 months, 2 high or critical

adequate

The newest was published on 2026-10-15. A project that publishes advisories is telling its users about its fixes, and the count and pace say how much security work it carries.

Evidence
2026-10-15: CVE-2026-111344 (moderate): APITable through 1.14.0-beta Authorization Bypass via GET /node/{nodeId}/description
2026-09-05: CVE-2026-86120 (moderate): APITable through 1.13.0-beta.1 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in NodePermissionGuard that fails to enforce node-level access control when per
2026-09-02: CVE-2026-84485 (high): APITable through 1.13.0-beta.1 exposes the internal organization loadOrSearch endpoint without authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve me
2026-08-27: CVE-2026-80207 (moderate): APITable through 1.13.0-beta.1 annotates the create handler of InternalNotifyController with requiredLogin = false. ResourceInterceptor honours that annotation
2026-08-27: CVE-2026-80208 (high): APITable through 1.13.0-beta.1 annotates both getUserHistories and closePausedUserAccount in InternalUserController with requiredLogin = false. ResourceIntercep

Observability & Operations

strong

No finding.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on apitable/apitable: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.