Borehole · Project · free tier
anuken/mindustry
Free reading: not for reliance
3a54813 · 21,554 commits · 4,268 files
Read 2026-10-04

anuken/mindustry: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in anuken/mindustry's code and history at 3a54813: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturityadequate
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsnot assessable
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • LICENSE: Relicensed: MIT → GPL-3.0 (2018-03-22)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md:23: states a policy on AI-generated contributions

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

core/src/mindustry/content/Blocks.java is 7,037 lines, 82× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 85 lines. 24 files exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 7,037. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
core/src/mindustry/content/Blocks.java:1 — 7,037 lines (82× median)
core/src/mindustry/content/UnitTypes.java:1 — 4,674 lines (54× median)
core/src/mindustry/content/Fx.java:1 — 2,994 lines (35× median)
core/src/mindustry/logic/LStatements.java:1 — 2,599 lines (30× median)
core/src/mindustry/input/InputHandler.java:1 — 2,553 lines (30× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

adequate
02.3

Tests cover a thin slice of the codebase

adequate

10 test files against 908 source files (1.1%). This does not measure whether the tests are good, only whether enough of them exist for the codebase to be changed safely by someone who did not write it — which is exactly the situation after an acquisition.

Evidence
10 test files / 908 source files

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.19

3% of bug fixes add or change a test

adequate

Of 950 fixes in the last 24 months, 26 touched a test. A fix without the test that would have caught the bug can quietly come back, and the suite never learns from what went wrong.

Evidence
26 of 950

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.2

None of the standard security guard rails are configured

adequate

There is no disclosure policy, no automated dependency updates, no named code owners and no pre-commit configuration. None of these is load-bearing on its own. Their collective absence says that security posture here is whatever the current team happens to remember to do, which is not a posture that survives the team changing.

Evidence
checked 5 kinds of guard rail across 4,268 tracked files; 0 present
05.27

The build runs third-party code it does not pin

adequate

3 third-party CI actions are referenced by a tag or branch rather than a commit, so they run whatever that tag points to on the day. Tags have been moved to malicious commits in real supply-chain attacks, and a piped script is whatever the server returns that minute. Pinning to a commit is the fix, and it is small.

Evidence
.github/workflows/deployment.yml:64 — action pinned by tag
.github/workflows/gradle-wrapper-validation.yml:10 — action pinned by tag
05.60

Relicensed: MIT → GPL-3.0 (2018-03-22)

adequate

The root licence changed 1 time(s). The latest terms restrict what users, hosts or a buyer may do in ways the earlier ones did not. Code taken under the old terms stays under them, so both matter in diligence.

Evidence
LICENSE — MIT from 2017-12-13
LICENSE — GPL-3.0 from 2018-03-22

Observability & Operations

not assessable

Not rated: only 5 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on anuken/mindustry: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.