Borehole · Project · free tier
angular/angularfire
Free reading: not for reliance
29ca012 · 1,130 commits · 525 files
Read 2026-10-23

angular/angularfire: technical due diligence, read from its repository

What Borehole read in angular/angularfire's code and history at 29ca012: its licence, security advisories, releases, review practice, tests, dependencies and operations. Every finding cites the file and line it rests on. The full report also covers the team and asks the questions the code cannot answer.

DimensionRating
Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenancestrong
Engineering Process & SDLC Maturitystrong
Product & Engineering Maturityadequate
Security & Reliability Postureadequate
Observability & Operationsnot assessable
Fit with the Acquirernot assessable

What the repository says

  • Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

Architecture & Codebase — including AI provenance

strong
01.6

src/schematics/update/v21/vertexai-to-ai.jasmine.ts is 1,277 lines, 31× this codebase's median file

adequate

The median source file here is 41 lines. 1 file exceed 1,000 lines, the largest being 1,277. Size is not a defect on its own — some problems genuinely live in one place — but these are where merge conflicts, review fatigue and single-owner knowledge concentrate, and they are the first thing that slows an inheriting engineer down.

Evidence
src/schematics/update/v21/vertexai-to-ai.jasmine.ts:1 — 1,277 lines (31× median)

Engineering Process & SDLC Maturity

strong

No finding.

Product & Engineering Maturity

adequate
04.19

5% of bug fixes add or change a test

adequate

Of 38 fixes in the last 24 months, 2 touched a test. A fix without the test that would have caught the bug can quietly come back, and the suite never learns from what went wrong.

Evidence
2 of 38
04.62

Releases are cut from another branch than the one surveyed

adequate

The newest release, 20.1.1, is not on the branch this survey read; the newest release on it is 20.0.1. The shipped product may differ from what this report describes. Survey the release branch too.

Evidence
tag 20.1.1

Security & Reliability Posture

adequate
05.1

3 credential-shaped strings in the tree sit in tests, examples, documentation or local development settings

adequate

Strings shaped like credentials appear only where fakes are usual: test fixtures, examples, documentation, placeholders and local stacks. They are almost always fakes. Ask someone to confirm that none of them works anywhere, because a real key in a development file is still a real key.

Evidence
3 cited: Google API key, where fakes are usual
05.26

3 locked dependencies have published vulnerabilities, 1 high or critical in what ships

adequate

3 of 457 locked dependencies match 4 published advisories in OSV, 1 of them rated high or critical. A lockfile says which version is installed, not whether the flawed code is reachable from this product, so each needs a look. Most are fixed by an upgrade, and the advisory names the version.

Evidence
package-lock.json — @grpc/grpc-js 1.9.16: GHSA-m9gg-hp2v-232j (high), fixed in 1.13.6
package-lock.json — esbuild 0.24.2: GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99 (moderate), fixed in 0.25.0
package-lock.json — uuid 9.0.1: GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq (moderate), fixed in 11.1.1

Observability & Operations

not assessable

Not rated: only 5 of 16 checks could reach a conclusion here; the rest do not apply to this repository or could not read it.

Fit with the Acquirer

not assessable

Not rated: structurally not assessable from a repository.

Read more, or read your own

The full report on angular/angularfire: every dimension, the questions for the room, and the audit log.

Survey a repository: free on public repositories. Private code is read on your own machine by a collector whose source you can read first.